AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to explore the factors affecting novice surface-combat-swimming (sCS) performance and how it differs from freestyle swimming (FS) performance.
  • A total of 13 competitive swimmers underwent various tests to measure their strength, range of motion, and physiological capacities, as well as performance in both swimming styles.
  • Results showed that FS performance was mainly predicted by aerobic capacity, while sCS performance was linked to hip-extension strength, indicating that different strategies may be employed for the two swimming types due to the challenges present in sCS.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To examine strength, range of motion, anthropometric, and physiological contributions to novice surface-combat-swimming (sCS) performance and establish differences from freestyle-swimming (FS) performance to further understand the transition of FS to sCS performance.

Methods: A total of 13 competitive swimmers (7 male and 6 female; 27.7 [2.3] y; 176.2 [2.6] cm; 75.4 [3.9] kg) completed 8 testing sessions consisting of the following: physiological land-based measurements for maximal anaerobic and aerobic capacity and upper- and lower-extremity strength and range of motion, an sCS anaerobic capacity swim test measuring peak and mean force and fatigue index, 2 aerobic capacity tests measuring maximal aerobic capacity for both FS and sCS, and four 500-m performance swims for time, 1 FS, and 3 sCS. Separate multiple linear-regression analysis was used to analyze predictors of both sCS and FS performance models.

Results: FS performance was predicted by the final FS maximal oxygen uptake with an R2 of 42.03% (F1,10 = 7.25; P = .0226), whereas sCS performance was predicted by isometric hip-extension peak strength with an R2 of 41.46% (F1,11 = 7.79; P = .0176).

Conclusions: Results demonstrate that different physiological characteristics predict performance, suggesting that an altered strategy is used for novice sCS than FS. It is suggested that this may be due to the added constraints as mandated by mission requirements including boots, weighted gear, and clandestine requirements with hips lowered beneath the surface. Further research should examine the kinematics of the sCS flutter kick to improve performance by developing training strategies specific for the task.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0112DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scs performance
12
aerobic capacity
12
performance
9
scs
9
strength range
8
range motion
8
performance predicted
8
improvement flutter-kick
4
flutter-kick performance
4
performance novice
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!