Sorafenib has been recommended as the standard therapy for advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the difference in overall survival (OS) between treatments with sorafenib combined with regional therapies versus sorafenib monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with pulmonary oligometastases. The study retrospectively enrolled 95 consecutive patients who underwent sorafenib therapy. A combined group (CG) of 40 patients received regional therapy in addition to sorafenib, and a monotherapy group (MG) of 55 patients received only sorafenib. OS was the primary endpoint, and time to progression (TTP) was the secondary endpoint. Subgroup analysis was further performed to evaluate the differences between the two groups. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to overcome the bias. Median OS was significantly longer in the CG than in the MG (18.37 vs. 7.13 months; = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified three baseline characteristics that were prognostic indicators of OS: macrovascular invasion, regional therapy, and alpha-fetoprotein. Median TTP was significantly longer in the CG than in the MG (2.93 vs. 2.23 months; = 0.004). Further multivariate analysis showed alpha-fetoprotein, total bilirubin, and regional therapy as prognostic indicators of TTP. After propensity score matching, 34 paired patients constituted each group. Patients in the adjusted CG showed a longer OS and TTP than those in the adjusted MG (OS: 18.37 vs. 7.37 months, = 0.015; TTP: 3.12 vs. 2.265 months, = 0.009). Multivariate analysis showed that combining regional therapies was still a prognostic indicator of OS ( = 0.01) and TTP ( = 0.001). Sorafenib combined with regional therapies may be associated with prolonged OS and TTP in HCC patients with pulmonary oligometastases compared with sorafenib monotherapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968762 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.24568 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
December 2024
Center for Pharmacometrics, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1200 Cailun Road, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Objectives: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapies for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).
Methods: The study included clinical trials of first-line systemic therapies for aHCC since the approval of sorafenib in 2007. Hazard function models were used to describe changes in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) over time.
Adv Ther
December 2024
Source Health Economics, London, UK.
Introduction: This study compared the relative efficacy of first-line lenvatinib, a standard-of-care treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), vs licensed/license in-progress comparators. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and network meta-analysis (NMA), updated evidence for lenvatinib monotherapy from LEAP-002, in addition to evidence from REFLECT, was included in the analyses.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via systematic review.
Ann Hematol
December 2024
Center for Cell Based Therapy, São Paulo Research Foundation, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3-ITD mutation represents a quarter of AML patients and is associated with high relapse rate and dismal prognosis. FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were developed in order to target this genetic alteration and among these TKIs, AC220 (quizartinib) combined with chemotherapy has already shown an increased overall survival for patients with AML with FLT3-ITD mutation. Even though this increase in overall survival was significant, it remains discrete, and relapse rate is still high, so there is an unmet medical need.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Microbiol
November 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases, and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Pharmacoeconomics
November 2024
Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, 3255 Eden Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
Background: Treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is challenging. Clinical trials have shown that Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab (STRIDE) offers clinical benefits as a first-line treatment for uHCC, but its cost effectiveness remains unknown in the USA.
Objective: We aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of STRIDE (tremelimumab plus durvalumab) versus sorafenib and durvalumab monotherapy as the first-line treatment for uHCC in the USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!