AI Article Synopsis

  • Clinicians face significant professional burnout due to emotional exhaustion from witnessing the suffering of undocumented immigrants in need of emergency-only hemodialysis (EOHD) and struggle with a perceived lack of control over treatment criteria.
  • Many report moral distress arising from providing care influenced by nonmedical factors, leading to concerns about the quality of care over quantity and a sense of injustice in the healthcare system.
  • Despite these challenges, some clinicians find inspiration in their patients' resilience, motivating them to advocate for better conditions and care for vulnerable populations.

Article Abstract

Background: In the United States, nearly half of undocumented immigrants with end-stage kidney disease receive hemodialysis only when they are evaluated in an emergency department and are found to have life-threatening renal failure ("emergency-only hemodialysis" [EOHD]). These patients experience psychosocial distress and much higher mortality than patients receiving regularly scheduled hemodialysis, but little is known about how providing EOHD affects the clinicians involved.

Objective: To understand clinicians' experiences providing EOHD.

Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews.

Setting: A safety-net hospital in Denver, Colorado, and a safety-net system in Houston, Texas.

Participants: Fifty interdisciplinary clinicians experienced in providing EOHD.

Measurements: Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Outcomes included themes and subthemes.

Results: Four themes and 13 subthemes (in parentheses) were identified: 1) drivers of professional burnout (emotional exhaustion from witnessing needless suffering and high mortality, jeopardizing patient trust, detaching from patients, perceived lack of control over EOHD criteria, and physical exhaustion from overextending to bridge care), 2) moral distress from propagating injustice (altered care based on nonmedical factors, focus on volume at the expense of quality, and need to game the system), 3) confusing and perverse financial incentives (wasting resources, confusing financial incentives, and concerns about sustainability), and 4) inspiration toward advocacy (deriving inspiration from patients and strengthened altruism).

Limitation: Whether the findings apply to other settings is unknown, and social desirability response bias might have reduced reporting of negative perceptions and experiences.

Conclusion: Clinicians in safety-net settings who provide EOHD to undocumented patients describe experiencing moral distress and being driven toward professional burnout. The burden of EOHD on clinicians should inform discussions of systemic approaches to support provision of adequate care based on medical need.

Primary Funding Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M18-0400DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

undocumented immigrants
8
qualitative study
8
eohd clinicians
8
professional burnout
8
moral distress
8
care based
8
financial incentives
8
patients
5
clinicians' perspectives
4
providing
4

Similar Publications

Background: Undocumented individuals with hematologic malignancies in the United States face barriers to receiving often-curative stem cell transplant (SCT), instead receiving inferior treatment with higher mortality. Federal and state policies' impact on undocumented individuals' lived experiences goes unnoticed.

Objective: To understand the experiences of this rare population of undocumented individuals with hematologic malignancies who cannot receive medically indicated SCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Racist and xenophobic policies in the United States (e.g., family separations and lack of access to protected immigration statuses for undocumented immigrants) have historically excluded immigrants of color from accessing full civil rights, thus contributing to widening racial inequities in the US.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

US public opinion about interior border checkpoints and health care access for undocumented immigrants.

Health Econ Policy Law

December 2024

Department of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Legal status is an important social determinant of health. Immigration enforcement policies may be an important contributor to health disparities in the form of interior border checkpoints (IBCs). These checkpoints may prevent immigrants and their families from seeking needed medical care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!