Enhancing Treatment Reengagement for Veterans With Serious Mental Illness: Evaluating the Effectiveness of SMI Re-Engage.

Psychiatr Serv

The authors are with the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Dr. Abraham is also with the Department of Psychology, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit. Dr. McCarthy is also with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Published: August 2018

Objective: This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) program Reengaging Veterans With Serious Mental Illness in Treatment (SMI Re-Engage). The program serves veterans with serious mental illness who experience extended gaps in use of VHA care.

Methods: Propensity score-weighted survival analysis that adjusted for demographic, clinical, and utilization factors assessed whether being contacted via SMI Re-Engage predicted return to VHA care within 18 months of when clinicians received patient contact information and, among veterans contacted, whether return to VHA care was associated with mortality risk within the 18-month follow-up period. Among all veterans who returned to care, a post hoc propensity score-weighted logistic regression that adjusted for demographic, clinical, and utilization factors assessed whether being contacted via SMI Re-Engage was associated with returning to outpatient care versus inpatient or emergency care.

Results: Of veterans contacted (N=886), 42% returned to care, compared with 27% of veterans whom providers attempted to contact but could not reach (N=2,059). When analyses adjusted for covariates, veterans who were contacted had a higher risk of returning to care (hazard ratio (HR)=3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.70-4.28). Among veterans contacted, the association between return to VHA care and mortality risk was not significant. Post hoc analyses for veterans who returned to care (N=941) indicated that being contacted (versus not being contacted) was associated with higher odds of returning to outpatient care (versus inpatient or emergency care) (odds ratio=2.42, CI=1.68-3.47).

Conclusions: SMI Re-Engage contact facilitated return to VHA care. SMI Re-Engage exemplifies how population health strategies can address health care discontinuities among people with serious mental illness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700407DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

smi re-engage
24
serious mental
16
mental illness
16
return vha
16
vha care
16
veterans contacted
16
veterans serious
12
care
12
returned care
12
veterans
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!