Background: Armed conflicts are a major contributor to injury and death globally. Conflict-related injuries are associated with a high risk of wound infection, but it is unknown to what extent infection directly relates to sustainment of life and restoration of function. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome and resource consumption among civilians receiving acute surgical treatment due to conflict-related injuries. Patients with and without wound infections were compared.

Methods: We performed a cohort study using routinely collected data from 457 consecutive Syrian civilians that received surgical treatment for acute conflict-related injuries during 2014-2016 at a Jordanian hospital supported by Médecins Sans Frontières. We defined wound infection as clinical signs of infection verified by a positive culture. We used logistic regression models to evaluate infection-related differences in outcome and resource consumption.

Results: Wound infection was verified in 49/457 (11%) patients. Multidrug-resistance (MDR) was detected in 36/49 (73%) of patients with infection. Among patients with infection, 11/49 (22%) were amputated, compared to 37/408 (9%) without infection, crude relative risk = 2.62 (95% confidence interval 1.42-4.81). Infected patients needed 12 surgeries on average, compared to five in non-infected patients (p < .00001). Mean length of stay was 77 days for patients with infection, and 35 days for patients without infection (p = .000001).

Conclusions: Among Syrian civilians, infected conflict-related wounds had a high prevalence of MDR bacteria. Wound infection was associated with poor outcomes and high resource consumption. These results could guide the development of antibiotic protocols and adaptations of surgical management to improve care for wound infections in conflict-related injuries.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02744144 ). Registered April 13, 2016. Retrospectively registered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964734PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3149-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conflict-related injuries
16
wound infection
12
infection
9
injuries associated
8
resource consumption
8
cohort study
8
outcome resource
8
surgical treatment
8
infection verified
8
patients infection
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: The prevalence of abdominal injuries in war and conflict zones, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), presents a significant healthcare challenge. These injuries, often resulting from explosive devices, firearms, and shrapnel, lead to high morbidity and mortality rates due to delayed diagnoses, inadequate medical infrastructure, and limited access to specialised care. This review aims to summarise the literature on conflict-related abdominal injuries in LMICs, highlighting the impact of such trauma on healthcare systems and patient outcomes, and suggesting strategies for improvement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Conflict and catastrophe-related severe burn injuries: A challenging setting for antimicrobial decision-making.

J Infect

September 2024

Clinical Infection Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SW10 9NH London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.

Severe burns are a major component of conflict-related injuries and can result in high rates of mortality. Conflict and disaster-related severe burn injuries present unique challenges in logistic, diagnostic and treatment options, while wider conflict is associated with driving local antimicrobial resistance. We present a targeted review of available literature over the last 10 years on the use of systemic antimicrobial antibiotics in this setting and, given limited available data, provide an expert consensus discussion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gunshots and bomb blasts are important causes of extremity injuries in conflict zones, yet little research exists on the characteristics and outcomes of these injuries in civilian populations.

Methods: We performed a prospective cohort analysis utilizing data from a randomized trial conducted at two civilian hospitals in Jordan and Iraq in 2015-2019. Adults who presented ≤72 h of sustaining an extremity injury were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Armed conflict injury is a growing public health concern, particularly in regions like the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). The protracted conflicts and political unrest in this region have led to a substantial number of injuries. Despite this, there is still limited understanding of the specific injury patterns stemming from conflicts, such as the 2006 Lebanon conflict.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The year 2022 saw a significant rise in global state-based armed conflicts, totaling 56, with major violence in Ukraine, Myanmar, and Nigeria causing over 10,000 deaths, followed by a notable conflict between Israel and Hamas in October 2023.
  • - These escalating conflicts are now at their highest level since 1946, threatening global health through physical injuries, increased infectious diseases, malnutrition, and serious mental health issues, making it harder to achieve Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.
  • - The paper calls for urgent strategies to address the health crisis in conflict zones, including humanitarian responses, the protection of healthcare facilities and workers, and enhancing mental health support and preparedness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!