Patient-specific neurosurgical phantom: assessment of visual quality, accuracy, and scaling effects.

3D Print Med

1Department of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters at Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP CEP 14040-901 Brazil.

Published: March 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the use of SEBS gels and other materials to create patient-specific phantoms for neurosurgical training, providing a realistic alternative to human cadavers.
  • 3D printed models were successfully developed from MRI data, with evaluations showing high realism and utility from a neurosurgery team, particularly for models at 100% and 50% scale.
  • The findings suggest that these phantoms can enhance surgical planning and potentially lower training costs by maintaining accurate anatomical representations.

Article Abstract

Background: Training in medical education depends on the availability of standardized materials that can reliably mimic the human anatomy and physiology. One alternative to using cadavers or animal bodies is to employ phantoms or mimicking devices. Styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene (SEBS) gels are biologically inert and present tunable properties, including mechanical properties that resemble the soft tissue. Therefore, SEBS is an alternative to develop a patient-specific phantom, that provides real visual and morphological experience during simulation-based neurosurgical training.

Results: A 3D model was reconstructed and printed based on patient-specific magnetic resonance images. The fused deposition of polyactic acid (PLA) filament and selective laser sintering of polyamid were used for 3D printing. Silicone and SEBS materials were employed to mimic soft tissues. A neuronavigation protocol was performed on the 3D-printed models scaled to three different sizes, 100%, 50%, and 25% of the original dimensions. A neurosurgery team (17 individuals) evaluated the phantom realism as "very good" and "perfect" in 49% and 31% of the cases, respectively, and rated phantom utility as "very good" and "perfect" in 61% and 32% of the cases, respectively. Models in original size (100%) and scaled to 50% provided a quantitative and realistic visual analysis of the patient's cortical anatomy without distortion. However, reduction to one quarter of the original size (25%) hindered visualization of surface details and identification of anatomical landmarks.

Conclusions: A patient-specific phantom was developed with anatomically and spatially accurate shapes, that can be used as an alternative for surgical planning. Printed models scaled to sizes that avoided quality loss might save time and reduce medical training costs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954795PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-018-0025-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient-specific phantom
8
models scaled
8
"very good"
8
good" "perfect"
8
original size
8
phantom
5
patient-specific
4
patient-specific neurosurgical
4
neurosurgical phantom
4
phantom assessment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!