AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined how different durations of a half-time re-warm up (RW) affect intermittent sprint performance in 13 healthy men, using a randomized crossover design.
  • Participants performed a 40-minute exercise followed by a 15-minute half-time with three different interventions: rest, 7 minutes of cycling, and 3 minutes of cycling.
  • Results indicated that both RW durations (3 min and 7 min) significantly improved performance during the initial part of a subsequent exercise test compared to the traditional rest, demonstrating that even a short RW can enhance sprint performance.

Article Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of different durations of half-time re-warm up (RW) on intermittent sprint performance. Using a randomized crossover design, 13 healthy men performed three trials, which consisted of two, 40-min intermittent exercises separated by a 15-min half-time. Half-time interventions were 15 min of seated rest (Control), 7 min of cycling at 70% of maximal heart rate (HR) (7 min RW), and 3 min of cycling at 70% of HR (3 min RW). The second 40-min intermittent exercise as an exercise performance test was the Cycling Intermittent-Sprint Protocol (CISP), which consisted of 10 s of rest, 5 s of maximal sprint, and 105 s of low-intensity exercise at 50% of VO, with the cycles repeated over the 40-min duration. The mean work during the maximal sprint in the initial 10 min of the CISP was higher in the both RW trials than in the control trial (control: 3638 ± 906 J, 7 min RW: 3808 ± 949 J, p < 0.05, 3 min RW: 3827 ± 960 J, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences among three trials for mean work at 10-20, 20-30, and 30-40 min of the CISP. In the initial 10 min of the CISP, the change in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration during the 105 s of exercise at 50% of VO, oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, and respiratory exchange ratio were higher in both RW trials than in the control trial (p < 0.05). The rating of perceived exertion after half-time interventions was higher in both RW trials than in the control trial (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the 3 min RW increased intermittent sprint performance after the half-time, compared with a traditional passive half-time practice, and was as effective in improving intermittent sprint performance as the 7 min RW.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5950744PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intermittent sprint
16
sprint performance
16
min
12
min cisp
12
higher trials
12
trials control
12
control trial
12
half-time re-warm
8
three trials
8
40-min intermittent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!