AI Article Synopsis

  • - In regions where advanced genetic testing like aCGH and next-gen sequencing is limited, traditional karyotyping remains the primary method for diagnosing congenital malformations and intellectual disabilities, although it may miss certain chromosomal abnormalities.
  • - Two patient cases are discussed where significant chromosomal abnormalities, including deletions and duplications, were only identified through aCGH rather than conventional karyotyping, leading to distinctive clinical presentations.
  • - The cases emphasize the importance of clinical suspicion in diagnosis, advocating for the use of molecular cytogenetic techniques when traditional karyotyping results appear normal but a chromosomal imbalance is suspected.

Article Abstract

Background: In countries where comparative genomic hybridization arrays (aCGH) and next generation sequencing are not widely available due to accessibility and economic constraints, conventional 400-500-band karyotyping is the first-line choice for the etiological diagnosis of patients with congenital malformations and intellectual disability. Conventional karyotype analysis can rule out chromosomal alterations greater than 10 Mb. However, some large structural abnormalities, such as derivative chromosomes, may go undetected when the analysis is performed at less than a 550-band resolution and the size and banding pattern of the interchanged segments are similar. Derivatives frequently originate from inter-chromosomal exchanges and sometimes are inherited from a parent who carries a reciprocal translocation.

Case Presentation: We present two cases with derivative chromosomes involving a 9.1 Mb 5p deletion/14.8 Mb 10p duplication in the first patient and a 19.9 Mb 5p deletion/ 18.5 Mb 9p duplication in the second patient. These long chromosomal imbalances were ascertained by aCGH but not by conventional cytogenetics. Both patients presented with a deletion of the Cri du chat syndrome region and a duplication of another genomic region. Each patient had a unique clinical picture, and although they presented some features of Cri du chat syndrome, the phenotype did not conclusively point towards this diagnosis, although a chromosomopathy was suspected.

Conclusions: These cases highlight the fundamental role of the clinical suspicion in guiding the approach for the etiological diagnosis of patients. Molecular cytogenetics techniques, such as aCGH, should be considered when the clinician suspects the presence of a chromosomal imbalance in spite of a normal karyotype.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941813PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-018-0374-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

derivative chromosomes
12
chromosomes involving
8
conventional cytogenetics
8
etiological diagnosis
8
diagnosis patients
8
cri chat
8
chat syndrome
8
involving large
4
large rearranged
4
rearranged segments
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!