Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/KP.2018.0104 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
How Can We Optimize the Results of Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffolds?
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Optimal Predilatation Treatment Before Implantation of a Magmaris Bioresorbable Scaffold in Coronary Artery Stenosis: The OPTIMIS Trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (K.N.H., J.T., M.N., M.H., J.E.-G., K.T.V., A.J., H.S.H., J.F.L., L.O.J.).
Background: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome limitations related to late stent failures of drug-eluting stents, but lumen reductions over time after implantation of BRS have been reported. This study aimed to investigate if lesion preparation with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon minimizes lumen reduction after implantation of a Magmaris BRS assessed with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Methods: Eighty-two patients with stable angina were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to lesion preparation with a scoring balloon versus a standard noncompliant balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS.
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Journey: A New Brick Into a Still Dismantled Wall.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Hospital Clínic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: A Little Too Late.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Brown University Health Cardiovascular Institute and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. Electronic address:
Early and Late Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: Final Report From the ABSORB Clinical Trial Program.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address:
Background: The risk-benefit ratio of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) may vary before and after 3 years, the time point of complete bioresorption of the poly-L-lactic acid scaffold.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the time-varying outcomes of the Absorb BVS compared with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES) from a large individual-patient-data pooled analysis of randomized trials.
Methods: The individual patient data from 5 trials that randomized 5,988 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to the Absorb BVS vs EES with 5-year follow-up were pooled.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!