Introduction: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is a life-saving device. Recording of a specialized 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required for S-ICD eligibility assessment. The goals of this study were: (1) evaluate the effect of ECG filtering on S-ICD eligibility, and (2) simplify S-ICD eligibility assessment by development of an S-ICD ineligibility prediction tool, which utilizes the widely available routine 12-lead ECG.

Methods And Results: Prospective cross-sectional study participants [n = 68; 54% male; 94% white, with wide ranges of age (18-81 y), body mass index (19-53), QRS duration (66-150 ms), and left ventricular ejection fraction (37-77%)] underwent 12-lead supine, 3-lead supine and standing ECG recording. All 3-lead ECG recordings were assessed using the standard S-ICD pre-implantation ECG morphology screening. Backward, stepwise, logistic regression was used to build a model for 12-lead prediction of S-ICD eligibility. Select electrocardiogram waves and complexes: QRS, R-, S, and T-amplitudes on all 12 leads, averaged QT interval, QRS duration, and R/T ratio in the lead with the largest T wave (R/T) were included as predictors. The effect of ECG filtering on ECG morphology was evaluated. A total of 9 participants (13%) failed S-ICD screening prior to filtering. Filtering at 3-40 Hz, similar to the S-ICD default, reduced S-ICD ineligibility to 4%. A regression model that included R, S, T, and R/T perfectly predicted S-ICD eligibility, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 1.0.

Conclusion: Routine clinical 12-lead ECG can be used to predict S-ICD eligibility. ECG filtering may improve S-ICD eligibility.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218287PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

s-icd eligibility
28
s-icd
13
ecg filtering
12
ecg
10
routine clinical
8
clinical 12-lead
8
12-lead ecg
8
eligibility
8
subcutaneous implantable
8
eligibility assessment
8

Similar Publications

Long-Term Outcomes of Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use Among Patients on Maintenance Dialysis.

Heart Rhythm

November 2024

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Background: Despite an elevated risk of sudden cardiac death among dialysis patients, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have not been shown to improve mortality and are associated with high complication rates. Subcutaneous (S-)ICDs may reduce the risk of complications for eligible dialysis patients, but safety and benefits vs transvenous (TV-ICDs are unknown.

Objective: To compare long-term outcomes between dialysis patients receiving S-ICD vs TV-ICDs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are effective in protecting patients against sudden death but expose them to a higher risk of inappropriate shock (IAS). We performed a systematic search of studies published between January 2010 and December 2019 assessing IAS due to cardiac oversensing by the selection process (PRISMA) and identified 17 eligible articles. Fifteen studies were observational, and two studies were retrospective.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Using artificial intelligence and deep learning to optimise the selection of adult congenital heart disease patients in S-ICD screening.

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J

June 2024

Cardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Introduction: The risk of complications associated with transvenous ICDs make the subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD) a valuable alternative in patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). However, higher S-ICD ineligibility and higher inappropriate shock rates-mostly caused by T wave oversensing (TWO)- are observed in this population. We report a novel application of deep learning methods to screen patients for S-ICD eligibility over a longer period than conventional screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Electrocardiographic screening before subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation is unsuccessful in around 10% of cases. A personalized screening method, by slightly moving the electrodes, to obtain a better R/T ratio has been described to overcome traditional screening failure.

Objective: The objectives of the SIS study were to assess to what extent a personalized screening method improves eligibility for S-ICD implantation and to evaluate the inappropriate shock rate after such screening success.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • LVADs are becoming more popular for treating advanced heart failure, and this study examines patients who had a subcutaneous ICD prior to LVAD surgery.
  • The research involved 30 patients with a median age of 45, focusing on the performance and complications of using both devices together, with follow-up averaging 7 months.
  • Results showed high compatibility but highlighted issues like electromagnetic interference affecting device sensing, leading to inappropriate shocks in some patients; careful monitoring for these problems is essential.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!