Global longitudinal strain corrected by RR-interval is a superior echocardiographic predictor of outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Int J Cardiol

Department of Cardiology, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Niels Andersensvej 65, Post 835, DK-2900 Copenhagen, Denmark; Clinical Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Published: July 2018

Background: Echocardiographic assessment of systolic and diastolic function during atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. This study evaluates the prognostic value of strain in patients with AF and suggests a novel approach on how to take into account the varying heart cycle lengths in AF.

Methods: Echocardiograms from 204 patients with AF during examination were analyzed offline. Patients with known heart failure (HF) were excluded. Peak global longitudinal strain (GLS) was averaged from 18 myocardial segments. To adjust for the varying heart cycle lengths, we indexed GLS with the square root of the RR-interval, (GLS/√(RR)). The composite endpoint included incident HF, stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality.

Results: During a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 82 patients (40%) reached the composite endpoint. Decreasing GLS/√(RR) was significantly associated with the composite endpoint, and the risk of reaching the endpoint increased significantly per 1%/sec decrease in strain (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20, p < 0.001). GLS/√(RR) remained an independent predictor even after adjustment for various risk factors and conventional echocardiography (LVEF and E/e') (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.19, p = 0.017). In contrast, GLS did not remain a significant predictor after adjusting for the same variables (p = 0.07), neither did LVEF (p = 0.11).

Conclusion: Decreasing GLS/√(RR) was significantly associated with increased risk of an adverse outcome and remained an independent predictor after multivariable adjustment. Indexing GLS with the square root of the RR-interval can counteract the variable cycle length in AF patients and GLS/√(RR) offers a more convincing risk-stratification assessment in AF patients compared with GLS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.038DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

composite endpoint
12
global longitudinal
8
longitudinal strain
8
atrial fibrillation
8
varying heart
8
heart cycle
8
cycle lengths
8
patients
5
strain
4
strain corrected
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!