Purpose: To compare differences in patient radiation exposure (PRE) during transarterial yttrium-90 (Y) radioembolization (TARE) between transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA).

Materials And Methods: A total of 810 consecutive first-time TARE procedures in patients from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis matched TRA and TFA groups on the basis of patient age, sex, weight, height, cancer type, Y microsphere type, and number of previous procedures from the same and opposite approaches. Matched groups were then compared by PRE measures fluoroscopy time (FT), dose-area product (DAP), and cumulative air kerma (AK). Effect size for each PRE measure was calculated.

Results: Before PSM, TRA and TFA groups differed significantly in mean age, weight, and number of previous procedures from the same and opposite approach (all P < .05). After PSM, each group consisted of 302 procedures (overall, n = 604) and no longer differed in any procedure performed before surgery measure. TRA did not differ from the matched TFA group regarding median FT (9.50 vs 9.40 minutes, P = .095), median DAP (67,066 vs 67,219 mGy·cm; P = .19), or median AK (323.63 vs 248.46 mGy; P = .16). Effect sizes were 0.068, 0.054, and 0.110 for FT, DAP, and AK, respectively.

Conclusions: No statistical differences were found for PRE measures between the matched TRA and TFA approach groups. Furthermore, practical effect sizes were considered to be small for AK and less than small for FT and DAP, and therefore, any differences in PRE between the radial and femoral approaches for TARE are minor and unlikely to be noticeable in everyday clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tra tfa
12
patient radiation
8
radiation exposure
8
yttrium-90 radioembolization
8
matched tra
8
tfa groups
8
number previous
8
previous procedures
8
procedures opposite
8
pre measures
8

Similar Publications

Introduction In the realm of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS), various access methods such as Transfemoral access (TFA), Transradial Artery access (TRA), and Transbrachial access (TBA) have been employed. While TFA is widely established, TRA and TBA offer alternative options. TBA lacks comprehensive studies, and there is a notable lack of comprehensive evidence systematically evaluating its outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comprehensive Analysis of Neurologic Complications Following Transradial Cerebral Angiography.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

December 2024

From the Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Background And Purpose: Transradial access (TRA) for cerebral angiography has become more popular due to fewer complications and greater patient comfort compared to transfemoral access. However, the frequency and nature of neurologic complications linked to TRA remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the incidence of symptomatic neurologic complications after transradial cerebral angiography, identify risk factors, and characterize clinical and imaging features of these complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Transradial access (TRA) is not a common vascular access in children. We have been performing TRA actively to reduce puncture complications, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of TRA in young children.

Methods: The study included 29 patients aged 5-12 years who underwent diagnostic catheterization at Kurume University Hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has traditionally been performed using the transfemoral approach (TFA). Recently, the transradial approach (TRA) has gained attention for its lower invasiveness and reduced complication risk. This study compares outcomes between two access strategy timeframes, TFA-first and TRA-first, to evaluate how this shift influences outcomes in a real-world setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: Body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable risk factor that has been shown to affect outcomes in neurointervention. The impact of BMI on choice of access site (transradial access (TRA) or transfemoral access (TFA), remains undescribed to our knowledge. Our study analyzes outcomes of TRA and TFA stratified by BMI in patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiograms in an outpatient setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!