A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The biomechanical evaluation of a novel 3-strand docking technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in the elbow. | LitMetric

Background And Hypothesis: The original 2-strand docking technique for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction has recently been modified to use a 3-strand graft. To date, no biomechanical study has compared the 2 techniques. We hypothesized that the 3-strand docking technique would restore valgus laxity to its native state, with comparable load-to-failure characteristics to the 2-strand docking technique.

Materials And Methods: Sixteen fresh cadaveric elbows were matched to the corresponding contralateral side from the same individual to create 8 matched pairs and were then randomized to undergo ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using either the 2- or 3-strand technique. Valgus laxity and rotation measurements were quantified using a MicroScribe 3DLX digitizer at various flexion angles for the native state, transected state, and 1 of the 2 tested reconstructed ligaments. Each reconstruction was then tested to failure.

Results: Valgus laxity for the intact state at elbow flexion angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° was 7° ± 2°, 7° ± 2°, 6° ± 1°, and 5° ± 2°, respectively. These values were similar to those of both reconstruction techniques. On load-to-failure testing, there was no significant difference in any parameter recorded. Yield torques for the 3- and 2-strand reconstructions were 13.4 ± 4.80 N/m and 11.8 ± 4.76 N/m, respectively (P = .486). The ultimate torques were 15.7 ± 6.10 N/m and 14.4 ± 5.58 N/m for the 3- and 2-strand techniques, respectively (P = .582).

Conclusion: The 3-strand docking technique was able to restore valgus laxity to the native state, with similar load-to-failure characteristics to the 2-strand docking technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

docking technique
20
valgus laxity
16
3-strand docking
12
ulnar collateral
12
collateral ligament
12
ligament reconstruction
12
2-strand docking
12
native state
12
technique restore
8
restore valgus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!