Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: In pursuit to improve soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), a wireless device was introduced to assess femorotibial pressures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of this device.
Methods: After 33 TKAs were balanced by conventional techniques, contact pressures were measured using a wireless sensor 3 times in a row; twice while the examiner was blinded for the result (n = 29); and once while the examiner was able to see the result as visual feedback (n = 32). Femorotibial pressures were measured in the medial and lateral compartments with the knee in 10°, 45°, and 90° of flexion (6 measurements per TKA). Furthermore, both the combined pressure and the difference in pressure between the compartments was calculated throughout the 3 positions (together another 6 measurements per TKA).
Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient between the blind measurements was poor in 2 of the 12 (17%), moderate in 4 of 12 (33%), and good in 6 of 12 (50%) measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the blind and observing measurement was poor in 2 of the 12 (17%), moderate in 6 of 12 (50%), and good in 4 of 12 (33%) measurements. Especially measurements in 10° of flexion are associated with poorer reliability.
Conclusion: The wireless sensor has a moderate to good reliability in 83% of the measurements.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.067 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!