AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted to compare the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide) and basal insulin (insulin glargine) on glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled by metformin, using a continuous glucose monitoring system for assessment.
  • Both treatments decreased mean blood glucose and certain glycemic metrics, but exenatide showed superior results in terms of reducing glycemic excursions and improving body weight-related factors compared to insulin glargine.
  • Overall, while both treatments improved blood glucose control and related health metrics, exenatide led to greater reductions in weight and waist circumference, suggesting it may be a more effective option for managing glycemic variability in this patient population.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Increasing the frequency of blood glucose monitoring aids the evaluation of glycemic variability and blood glucose control by antidiabetic drugs. It remains unclear, however, whether GLP-1 receptor agonists or basal insulin has a better effect on glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients who are inadequately controlled by metformin. We used a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to compare patients on a GLP-1 receptor agonist with patients on basal insulin in terms of glycemic variability.

Methods: This prospective randomized study assigned T2DM patients treated with metformin (N = 39) to either exenatide treatment or insulin glargine treatment for 16 weeks. Glycemic variability was assessed using a CGMS; hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), β-cell function, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were also evaluated.

Results: Mean blood glucose level, continuous overlapping net glycemic action, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, percentage of the time that the blood glucose value was > 10.0 mmol/L, and highest blood glucose level (P  < 0.01-0.05) significantly decreased in both groups. Standard deviation of the mean glucose value, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions, and waist circumference significantly decreased for those treated with exenatide (P  < 0.05), while no changes were observed with insulin glargine treatment. Percentage of the time that the blood glucose value was > 7.8 mmol/L decreased after insulin glargine use (P  < 0.05) but not with the exenatide intervention. Similar decreases in fasting blood glucose and HbA1c and increases in the 1/homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, disposition index 30, and disposition index 120 were observed in both groups (P  < 0.01-0.05). Reductions in weight and BMI were greater with exenatide than with insulin glargine treatment (P  < 0.05).

Conclusions: In overweight and obese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled by metformin, exenatide and insulin glargine have similar efficacies in terms of glycemic variability, HbA1c alleviation, and β-cell function, but exenatide has a greater effect on body weight and BMI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984915PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0412-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood glucose
20
glycemic variability
16
t2dm patients
12
patients treated
8
insulin glargine
8
glucose monitoring
8
glp-1 receptor
8
basal insulin
8
glucose level
8
glucose
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!