A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Simple and economical method for identification and speciation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulase negative Staphylococci and its validation by molecular methods. | LitMetric

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) have been increasingly recognized as a clinically important group of species that can cause several opportunistic nosocomial infections. There are at least 47 known species of Staphylococci and to differentiate all these species >40 biochemical tests need to be performed. The present study was able to refine the CoNS identification process by using only five tests to identify S. epidermidis from the rest and used six other tests to identify eleven other clinically significant CoNS species. A total of 242 CoNS isolates were collected from tertiary care hospitals and included in the study. The five-biochemical test scheme devised based on mathematical probability derived from a computer algorithm included fermentation of mannitol, maltose, mannose, trehalose and novobiocin susceptibility to differentiate S. epidermidis from other CoNS species. The remaining CoNS isolates other than S. epidermidis were further characterized with the help of six additional tests, which identified another eleven species. Species-specific PCR and 16SrDNA sequencing were used to confirm and validate the identification scheme. Species-specific PCR and 16SrDNA sequencing showed 100% agreement with non-divergent phenotypic test results, indicating that the five selected assays are highly specific for identifying S. epidermidis. In conclusion, this study used only 11 tests to identify most of the clinically significant CoNS that can reduce cost and time. This scheme is easy to perform in any laboratory with basic resources, the results of this study were validated using more accurate molecular methods such as PCR and 16S rDNA typing to confirm the utility of the proposed scheme.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.05.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tests identify
12
molecular methods
8
clinically cons
8
cons species
8
cons isolates
8
species-specific pcr
8
pcr 16srdna
8
16srdna sequencing
8
cons
7
species
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!