Cobalt Molybdate (β-CoMoO) and Cobalt Oxide (CoO) nanocomposite was prepared via co-precipitation and solid-state methods. Various techniques like powder XRD, FESEM, HRTEM, FTIR, VSM, UV-Vis and PL spectroscopy were used to investigate the structure and morphology of as prepared samples. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) reveals monoclinic and cubic structure for β-CoMoO and CoO respectively. The surface morphology was observed using field emission electron microscopy (FESEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), which shows the formation of nanocomposites at nanoscale range, the presence of elements were determined by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX). FTIR analysis confirms the formation and bonding nature of the samples. The anti-ferromagnetic behavior of CMCO64 composite was determined by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The bandgap values were calculated by extrapolating the straight line on the energy axis (hν), and the values of β-CoMoO CO and β-CoMoO - CO composites were determined to be 2.20, 2.09 eV and 1.54-2.44 eV respectively. The weak blue emission peak observed at 489 nm is corresponds to crystal defects only observed in CMCO01 and CMCO64 composite, for CMCO10 the peak shifted to green region. Antibacterial studies illustrate good result for the CMCO64 composite against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The sensor studies were measured at different humidity environment (RH to RH). It was found that the increase in relative humidity leads to increase in the sensitivity factor of the samples. Among the samples CMCO64 composite possess highest sensitivity factor of (S = 4851) with response time of 60 s and recovery time of 230 s respectively.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.04.034 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!