A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs. | LitMetric

Objectives: To characterize anatomic variants of the external ear canal (EAC), specifically canal wall overhangs. EAC overhangs are problematic since they obstruct the view of the tympanic membrane (TM) and middle ear, possibly creating diagnostic and surgical difficulties.

Methods: We reviewed pre-operative temporal bone CTs from children with cholesteatoma, and no history of EAC erosion or surgery. We measured the anterior canal wall overhang (ACOH), inferior (ICOH), and posterior-inferior (PICOH). A smaller angle means more EAC overhang. Angles >180° counted as 180° since they are non-obstructing. Analysis was performed between angular measurements and clinical and demographic data.

Results: 86 patients (88 ears total) were studied. Mean age was 8.3 years. Only obstructing angles were analyzed statistically (<180°). The ICOH was most severe and occurred in 72/88 (81.8%) ears with a mean of 145.9 ± 12.8SD° (range 102-171°). ACOH occurred in 60/88 (68.2%) ears with a mean of 148.3 ± 10.9SD° (range 120-169°). PICOH occurred in 59/88 (67%) ears with a mean of 150.4 ± 9.2SD° (range 124-169°). Overall, ICOH was significantly more severe than PICOH (P = 0.026). ICOH had more Severe (142-102°) overhangs (27/88, 30.7%) than ACOH (17/88, 19.3%) or PICOH (11/88, 12.5%), but these were not significantly different. Analysis of clinical data showed that as the ICOH overhang became more severe, there was a history of significantly more (p = 0.039, r = -0.209) tympanostomy tubes placed.

Conclusions: The greatest prevalence and severity of EAC overhang was the ICOH with a mean angle of 145.9°, compared with 148.3° and 150.4° for the ACOH and PICOH, respectively. This anatomic study demonstrates that ICOH and PICOH are prevalent anatomic variants and may possibly cause similar difficulties in otoscopic diagnosis and surgical TM and middle ear exposure as the well-known ACOH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.03.038DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

canal wall
12
anterior canal
8
wall overhangs
8
canal
5
external auditory
4
auditory canal
4
canal inferior
4
inferior posterior-inferior
4
posterior-inferior anterior
4
overhangs objectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!