AI Article Synopsis

  • Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) can lead to severe complications in traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases, and current ICP monitoring methods are invasive and risky.
  • A pilot study tested a new noninvasive method of measuring ICP using Doppler ultrasound on the ophthalmic artery, comparing it to traditional invasive sensors.
  • The study found no significant differences between the two measurement approaches, indicating that the noninvasive method is comparable and reliable for assessing ICP without the associated risks of surgery.

Article Abstract

Background: Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) causes secondary damage in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Current methods of ICP monitoring require surgery and carry risks of complications.

Objective: To validate a new instrument for noninvasive ICP measurement by comparing values obtained from noninvasive measurements to those from commercial implantable devices through this pilot study.

Methods: The ophthalmic artery (OA) served as a natural ICP sensor. ICP measurements obtained using noninvasive, self-calibrating device utilizing Doppler ultrasound to evaluate OA flow were compared to standard implantable ICP measurement probes.

Results: A total of 78 simultaneous, paired, invasive, and noninvasive ICP measurements were obtained in 11 ICU patients over a 17-mo period with the diagnosis of TBI, SAH, or ICH. A total of 24 paired data points were initially excluded because of questions about data independence. Analysis of variance was performed first on the 54 remaining data points and then on the entire set of 78 data points. There was no difference between the 2 groups nor was there any correlation between type of sensor and the patient (F[10, 43] = 1.516, P = .167), or the accuracy and precision of noninvasive ICP measurements (F[1, 43] = 0.511, P = .479). Accuracy was [-1.130; 0.539] mm Hg (CL = 95%). Patient-specific calibration was not needed. Standard deviation (precision) was [1.632; 2.396] mm Hg (CL = 95%). No adverse events were encountered.

Conclusion: This pilot study revealed no significant differences between invasive and noninvasive ICP measurements (P < .05), suggesting that noninvasive ICP measurements obtained by this method are comparable and reliable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy088DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

noninvasive icp
20
icp measurements
20
data points
12
icp
10
intracranial pressure
8
traumatic brain
8
brain injury
8
intracranial hemorrhage
8
icp measurement
8
invasive noninvasive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!