A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[RNA simultaneous and amplification testing versus the culture method for detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum infection]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of real-time RNA simultaneous amplification and testing (SAT) for detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) in semen from infertile men and to determine its clinical relevance.
  • Researchers compared the SAT method with traditional culture techniques using semen samples from 542 infertility patients and 120 fertile controls, finding that SAT identified significantly more cases of UU infections than culture.
  • While SAT proved to be a faster and more accurate detection method, the culture method still has benefits like easier operation and potential for drug sensitivity testing, suggesting that both methods can be used based on specific clinical needs.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of real-time RNA simultaneous amplification and testing (SAT) in the detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) in the semen of infertile males and its clinical significance.

Methods: We collected semen samples from 542 infertility patients and 120 normal fertile men as controls in the Andrology Clinic of Nanjing General Hospital from March to September 2015. We detected UU infection in the samples using the culture method and SAT technology, respectively.

Results: All the UU positive cases (except 4 false positive cases) detected by the culture method were also shown to be positive in SAT. The UU detection rate of SAT was significantly higher than that of the culture method both in the infertility patients (54.1 vs 19.7%, P<0.05) and in the normal controls (42.5 vs 12.5%, P<0.05).

Conclusions: SAT is a rapid and accurate method for detecting UU infection in semen samples, with a higher sensitivity and accuracy than the culture method, and it can also be used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. However, the culture method has its own advantages, such as low requirement of technical equipment, easy operation, and possibility of drug sensitivity test at the same time. Therefore, SAT and the culture method can be used alternatively according to the clinical need.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

culture method
16
simultaneous amplification
8
amplification testing
8
ureaplasma urealyticum
8
sat detection
8
infertility patients
8
positive cases
8
[rna simultaneous
4
testing versus
4
culture
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!