AI Article Synopsis

  • Diagnosing dermal-based lymphoid infiltrates is difficult due to a wide variety of conditions that can appear similar in the mid-dermis, leading to potential confusion in identification.
  • The differential diagnosis involves reactive conditions, benign entities that resemble lymphoid neoplasms, and true clonal proliferations, all of which require careful examination.
  • A comprehensive diagnostic strategy is recommended that combines analysis of lymphocyte composition and cell morphology, alongside consideration of the occurrence rate of each disease type and integration of various diagnostic aspects like clinical, histopathological, and possibly molecular data.

Article Abstract

The histopathological diagnosis of dermal-based lymphoid infiltrates and proliferations is often challenging due to the vast list of biologically diverse entities that archetypally or occasionally center in the mid-dermis, especially because significant overlap exists in their clinical, histopathologic, and immunophenotypic features. The differential diagnosis includes reactive infiltrates in common and rare inflammatory dermatoses, benign conditions that may mimic lymphoid neoplasms (pseudolymphomas), and true clonal proliferations arising either primarily in the skin or rarely in extracutaneous tissues with secondary cutaneous dissemination. While numerous histopathological and immunophenotypic features have been reported to support a definitive diagnosis, no single ancillary test is sufficient for their distinction. Therefore, in this review we advocate a stepped histopathological approach for dermalbased lymphoid infiltrations, employing as key elements the general lymphocytic composition (relative B- versus T-cell ratio), coupled with the predominant cytomorphology (cell size) present. Following this strategy, the relative incidence of cutaneous involvement by each disease should always be considered, as well as the notion that a definitive diagnosis must be founded on a multiparameter approach integrating all clinical, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and-in selected cases-molecular features.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12788/j.sder.2018.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dermal-based lymphoid
8
lymphoid infiltrates
8
infiltrates proliferations
8
clinical histopathologic
8
histopathologic immunophenotypic
8
immunophenotypic features
8
definitive diagnosis
8
approach dermal-based
4
lymphoid
4
proliferations histopathological
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Diagnosing dermal-based lymphoid infiltrates is difficult due to a wide variety of conditions that can appear similar in the mid-dermis, leading to potential confusion in identification.
  • The differential diagnosis involves reactive conditions, benign entities that resemble lymphoid neoplasms, and true clonal proliferations, all of which require careful examination.
  • A comprehensive diagnostic strategy is recommended that combines analysis of lymphocyte composition and cell morphology, alongside consideration of the occurrence rate of each disease type and integration of various diagnostic aspects like clinical, histopathological, and possibly molecular data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia (PCH) is a reactive proliferation of the epidermis that can be associated with many inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Histologically, it is characterized by irregular strands of epidermis, usually at the level of the follicular infundibulum, projecting downward into the dermis. The differentiation between a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma and PCH can be particularly challenging when the biopsy is superficial and the causing lesion is dermal-based.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The pigmentary purpuras (PPs) are a heterogeneous group of dermatoses defined by specific clinicopathologic features but sharing, at the light microscopic level, superficially disposed dermal lymphocytic infiltrates and hemorrhage. The term atypical pigmentary purpura (APP) is used by the authors in reference to cases of PP in which individual lesions, although clinically presenting as PP, show morphological features typically associated with mycosis fungoides (MF) including Sezary cells and epidermotropism. The integrated concept of lymphocyte atypia and PP is a confusing and enigmatic one to which reference in the literature has been previously made.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!