Research shows that individuals with liberal and conservative ideological orientations display different value positions concerning the acceptance of social change and inequality. Research also links the expression of different values to a number of biological factors, including heredity. In light of these biological influences, I investigate whether differences in social values associated with liberal and conservative ideologies reflect alternative strategies to maximize returns from social interactions. Using an American sample of Democrats and Republicans, I test whether information about shared and unshared social values in the form of implicit social attitudes have a disproportionate effect on the willingness of Democrats and Republicans to trust an anonymous social partner. I find evidence that knowledge of shared values significantly increases levels of trust among Democrats but not Republicans. I further find that knowledge of unshared values significantly decreases trust among Republicans but not Democrats. These findings are consistent with studies indicating that differences in ideological orientation are linked to differences in cognition and decision-making.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.29 | DOI Listing |
Am J Public Health
January 2025
Eric Geng Zhou is with the Center for Child Health Services Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Jonathan Cantor is with RAND, Santa Monica, CA. Autumn Gertz, John S. Brownstein, and Benjamin Rader are with Innovation and Digital Health Accelerator, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA. Brian Elbel is with the Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York.
To determine the association between parental characteristics and MMR (measles-mumps- rubella) vaccination status of children in the United States. We conducted a cross-sectional study from July 2023 to April 2024 using a digital health survey via OutbreaksNearMe, weighted to target national population characteristics. We analyzed the responses of 19 892 parents of children younger than 5 years to examine the association between self-reported parental characteristics (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPNAS Nexus
January 2025
Empirical Studies of Conflict, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Does the fact-checking enterprise focus its attention on one party? If Republican or Democratic politicians were systematically more likely to have their statements evaluated, that would call into question both the impartiality of the fact-checking enterprise and the results of the many papers that rely on fact-checks to drive other measurements. Despite frequent claims that fact-checking organizations are biased against Republicans, there is little systematic evidence regarding political bias in this industry. We address these gaps using data on how often each member of Congress was fact-checked from 2018 to 2021.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Environ Res Public Health
November 2024
Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
Our study aimed to assess the impact of political affiliation, personal beliefs, and policy measures on the intention to receive routine COVID-19 and influenza vaccines in the coming year. A cross-sectional study of 1256 individuals at Minnesota State and County Fairs was conducted to assess their intention to receive COVID-19 booster and influenza vaccines in the coming year. The association between vaccine intention and political affiliation, belief in collective responsibility, and workplace/school vaccine requirements were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCognition
March 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
How do we infer the beliefs of an entire group (e.g., Democrats) after being exposed to the beliefs of only a handful of group members? What if we know that the beliefs we encountered were selected in a biased manner? Across two experiments, we recruited 640 U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPublic Opin Q
October 2024
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria; and Senior Research Fellow, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
There is a growing worry about the health of American democracy, and political scientists and pundits alike are looking for possible explanations. Surveys conducted during the Trump presidency showed considerable citizen support for liberal democratic norm erosions, especially among Republicans. However, recent experimental research also shows that voters of both parties are more tolerant of norm erosion committed by politicians of the party they prefer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!