Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability of drinks and foods thickened with a gum-containing thickener compared to a starch-based thickener in patients with dysphagia.

Design: A randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel group study.

Methods: Subjects started with a 3-day run-in period on a starch-based thickener and continued with a 14-day intervention on either the starch-based or gum-containing thickener. GI tolerance parameters were recorded at baseline and for three consecutive days in both weeks. Product properties were studied using a feedback questionnaire from carers.

Findings: Incidence and intensity of GI symptoms was low and not significantly different between groups. Carers indicated that starch-thickened drinks became significantly thinner with time compared to gum-containing thickened drinks (p = .029).

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: No differences in GI tolerance parameters between groups were observed. We hypothesize that use of the gum-containing thickener is preferred to a starch-based thickener due to the stability of its viscosity during consumption.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/rnj.0000000000000011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gum-containing thickener
16
starch-based thickener
12
product properties
8
thickener patients
8
tolerance parameters
8
thickener
7
gum-containing
5
tolerability product
4
properties gum-containing
4
patients dysphagia
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!