AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to determine if MRI imaging features of breast cancer extracted by computers could match those assessed by human radiologists using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas.
  • - Ninety-one pre-operative breast MRIs were analyzed, with human radiologists evaluating tumors based on size and BI-RADS criteria, while computer algorithms extracted similar image features for comparison.
  • - Results indicated good agreement for tumor size and shape measurements between human and computer methods, but not for tumor margin or internal enhancement, suggesting potential for improving tumor assessment accuracy through quantitative radiomics.

Article Abstract

Background: In this study, we sought to investigate if computer-extracted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phenotypes of breast cancer could replicate human-extracted size and Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) imaging phenotypes using MRI data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project of the National Cancer Institute.

Methods: Our retrospective interpretation study involved analysis of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant breast MRI data from The Cancer Imaging Archive, an open-source database from the TCGA project. This study was exempt from institutional review board approval at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the need for informed consent was waived. Ninety-one pre-operative breast MRIs with verified invasive breast cancers were analysed. Three fellowship-trained breast radiologists evaluated the index cancer in each case according to size and the BI-RADS lexicon for shape, margin, and enhancement (human-extracted image phenotypes [HEIP]). Human inter-observer agreement was analysed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for size and Krippendorff's α for other measurements. Quantitative MRI radiomics of computerised three-dimensional segmentations of each cancer generated computer-extracted image phenotypes (CEIP). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to compare HEIP and CEIP.

Results: Inter-observer agreement for HEIP varied, with the highest agreement seen for size (ICC 0.679) and shape (ICC 0.527). The computer-extracted maximum linear size replicated the human measurement with  < 10. CEIP of shape, specifically sphericity and irregularity, replicated HEIP with both values < 0.001. CEIP did not demonstrate agreement with HEIP of tumour margin or internal enhancement.

Conclusions: Quantitative radiomics of breast cancer may replicate human-extracted tumour size and BI-RADS imaging phenotypes, thus enabling precision medicine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909355PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0025-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast mri
8
mri radiomics
8
imaging phenotypes
8
mri data
8
data cancer
8
tcga project
8
image phenotypes
8
inter-observer agreement
8
breast
7
cancer
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!