Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCAs are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, CKD stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m) and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated, and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Following a comprehensive review of the literature and reported NSF cases to date, a committee of radiologists and nephrologists developed clinical practice guidelines to assist physicians in making decisions regarding GBCA administrations. In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD (eGFR ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m), or on dialysis, administration of GBCAs should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCAs are necessary, newer GBCAs may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate), citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, with stage 4 or 5 CKD, or on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCAs. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCAs is recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2017.11.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gadolinium-based contrast
8
contrast agents
8
kidney disease
8
agents kidney
4
disease comprehensive
4
comprehensive review
4
review clinical
4
clinical practice
4
practice guideline
4
guideline issued
4

Similar Publications

Background: Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) are widely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to enhance image contrast by interacting with water molecules, thus improving diagnostic capabilities. However, understanding the residual accumulation of GBCA in tissues after administration remains an area of active research. This highlights the need for advanced analytical techniques capable of investigating interactions between GBCAs and biopolymers, such as type I collagen, which are abundant in the body.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The risk of developing a severe delayed cutaneous reaction (SCAR) is very low following iodine-based contrast medium (ICM) administration and extremely low following gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration. However, SCAR can be very severe and potentially life-threatening. It is crucial for the imaging physician to recognize danger signals: bullous skin eruption, skin erosion and detachment, mucosal involvement, systemic symptoms, and laboratory abnormalities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quantitative evaluation of dynamic glymphatic activity in insomnia: A contrast-enhanced synthetic MRI study.

Sleep Med

January 2025

Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University Nanchang, 330006, China; Intelligent Medical Imaging of Jiangxi Key Laboratory, 330006, Nanchang, China; School of Biomedical Engineering, National Graduate College for Engineers, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the connection between insomnia disorder (ID) and glymphatic circulation, utilizing dynamic synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (syMRI) on 32 insomnia patients and 10 healthy volunteers.
  • Results showed significant differences in T1 signal values in several brain areas, including the insula gray matter and hippocampal gray matter, between insomnia patients and the control group at various time points.
  • Statistical analyses indicated that time-varying T1 values in cerebral gray matter and the putamen also differed significantly between groups, suggesting potential glymphatic system involvement in insomnia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessing asymmetric enhancement on breast MRI: Besting the diagnostic challenge with imaging and clinical clues.

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol

January 2025

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Ave, Tucson AZ 85724, USA; Banner University Medical Center Tucson, 1625 N Campbell Ave, Tucson AZ 85719, USA.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the highest sensitivity for breast cancer detection compared to other breast imaging modalities such as mammography and ultrasound. As a functional modality, it captures the increased angiogenic activity of breast cancer through gadolinium-based contrast enhancement. Normal breast tissue also enhances, albeit in distinct patterns termed background parenchymal enhancement (BPE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!