AI Article Synopsis

  • The China National Formulary (CNF), also called the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL), was established in 2000 and updated in 2017 to improve access to reimbursable drugs for 52% of China's population under urban health insurance.
  • A pilot project initiated in 2017 aimed at negotiating prices for innovative, expensive drugs not included in the CNF, achieving an 81.8% agreement rate between the government and pharmaceutical companies for 44 medications.
  • The authors emphasize the need for future improvements to the CNF’s processes, such as refining evaluation criteria, standardizing documentation formats, and enhancing the professionalism of those conducting evaluations.

Article Abstract

The China National Formulary (CNF) for reimbursable drug use, also known as the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL), was formally established in 2000, revised in 2004 and 2009, and covers 52% of China's population under the government urban health insurance programs. A third major and long-awaited update to the formulary was completed in February 2017 based on intensive reviews by a group of experts in medicine, pharmacology, health economics, and health policy. Shortly after this major update, a pilot project at the central government level was implemented for negotiations mainly on innovative but expensive medicines that were still outside the National Formulary. The pilot, conducted between March and July 2017, eventually reached an overall agreement rate of 81.8% regarding approved indications and drug prices between China's government and the pharmaceutical companies. This pilot showcased numerous leading edge features including a working definition of innovative medicines and opportunities to submit dossiers on drug clinical and economic information. This pilot covered 44 medications for negotiations in a breakthrough attempt to increase the appropriate access to innovative but expensive medicines. The implications to the future of the CNF go beyond the drugs included in the pilot. This paper describes the background of the CNF and the negotiation pilot. In addition, authors of this paper make six recommendations critical to CNF future developments, including enhancing criteria and process for evaluations, standardizing the dossier format, specifying data requirements, refining pricing calculation, and cultivating evaluation professional development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2018.01.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

negotiations innovative
8
innovative medicines
8
national formulary
8
innovative expensive
8
expensive medicines
8
pilot
7
pricing negotiations
4
innovative
4
medicines
4
medicines pilot
4

Similar Publications

To Change or Not to Change: Perceptions and Experiential Knowledge of Tennis Coaches When Modifying Grip Technique.

Sports (Basel)

November 2024

Sport, Performance, and Nutrition Research Group, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, 1 Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.

The purpose of this study was to explore the experiential knowledge of tennis coaches as it related to the development of grip positions in tennis athletes. Accredited tennis coaches (n = 11) completed semi-structured interviews consisting of open-ended questions about their coaching background, the importance of grip positions compared with other areas of foundational development, and their opinions on using physically-constraining tools (PCTs). Two major themes, "Grip positions are an adaptive skill" and "Why and how do I modify an athlete's grip?", were identified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To alleviate the economic burden of innovative drugs on patients in China, the government has been negotiating drug prices since 2016 to enhance their accessibility. This systematic review aimed to discuss the impact of the National Medication Price Negotiation Policy (NMPNP) on the accessibility of drugs in China in the years 2016-2024.

Design: Systematically reviewed the studies' findings and evaluated their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) collaborative tool.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The combination of high prices and uncertain effectiveness is a growing challenge in the field of orphan medicines, hampering health technology assessments. Hence, new methods for establishing price benchmarks might be necessary to support reimbursement negotiations. In this study, we applied several pricing models containing cost-based elements to the case of lumasiran for treating primary hyperoxaluria type 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Digital health applications are digital medical products (e.g. apps and web applications) that are prescribed by healthcare service providers and reimbursed by health insurances.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of Managed Entry Agreements for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.

Clin Ther

December 2024

Department of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address:

Purpose: Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) are agreements between firms and competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement, designed to enable coverage of new medicines while managing uncertainties around their financial impact or performance. Although these agreements can facilitate patient access, their complexity and costs seem to dampen enthusiasm for implementation. Nevertheless, MEAs remain a potential route, particularly for high-cost drugs with uncertain value claims.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!