Objective: Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (Afirma GEC) molecular analysis (Veracyte, Inc, San Francisco, CA) is a negative predictive value test developed to reduce the number of thyroidectomies in thyroid nodule patients with indeterminate cytology. GEC technology has reportedly reduced unnecessary thyroid surgery, but few studies have examined Afirma GEC false-negative rates, since usually patients with GEC benign nodules do not undergo surgery for definitive diagnosis. Occasionally, Afirma GEC benign patients require removal of their thyroid nodules for other reasons; this work describes the incidence of malignancy and noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) in this population.
Methods: We reviewed our community endocrine surgical practice database for patients who had undergone thyroid surgery from January 2011 through April 2017 despite benign Afirma GEC results.
Results: Afirma GEC testing was completed for 475 patients during the study period. Surgery was clinically indicated for other reasons in 42 of the 193 patients (22%) with Afirma GEC benign results. Malignancy or NIFTP in the targeted nodule was found in the final histologic evaluation of 14 of the 42 Afirma GEC benign surgical patients. The Afirma GEC false-negative percentage for our incomplete surgical group (FNP-ISG), defined as the surgically proven false negatives divided by the total Afirma GEC benign patients, was 7.3%.
Conclusion: Our high surgical rate in Afirma GEC benign nodules reveals an FNP-ISG of 7.3% in our community endocrine surgical patient population; this value exceeds the 5.7% reported in the multicenter 2012 Afirma GEC validation study.
Abbreviations: Afirma GEC = Afirma Gene Expression Classifier; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; FNP = false-negative percentage; FNP-ISG = false-negative percentage for an incomplete surgical group; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4158/EP-2017-0263 | DOI Listing |
Endocr Connect
July 2024
Institue of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Objective: The management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology (ITN) is still a challenge. To evaluate the performance of commercial molecular tests for ITN, we performed this comprehensive meta-analysis.
Methods: We performed an electronic search using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library.
Endocrine
August 2024
Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.
Head Neck
September 2023
Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Background: The Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) were developed to improve risk stratification of indeterminate nodules. Our aim was to assess the clinical utility in a European population with restrictive diagnostic workup.
Methods: Clinical utility of the GEC was assessed in a prospective multicenter cohort of 68 indeterminate nodules.
Cancers (Basel)
March 2023
Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITN) represent 20-30% of biopsied nodules, with a 10-60% risk of malignancy. Molecular testing can stratify the risk of malignancy among ITNs, and subsequently reduce the need for unnecessary diagnostic surgery. We aimed to assess the performance of these molecular tests at a single institution.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThyroid
October 2022
Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Molecular tests for thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine needle aspiration results are increasingly used in clinical practice; however, true diagnostic summaries of these tests are unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were completed to (1) evaluate the accuracy of commercially available molecular tests for malignancy in indeterminate thyroid nodules and (2) quantify biases and limitations in studies that validate those tests. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched through July 2021.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!