Background: The Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) is a frequently used and highly relevant instrument to assess the therapeutic alliance. The questionnaire was translated into German by Bassler and colleagues (1995) and is available for patients (HAQ-P) and therapists (HAQ-T). Whereas the HAQ-P has been tested regarding psychometrics, the HAQ-T has not. This study aimed at further investigating the psychometric properties of both the HAQ-P and HAQ-T. We hypothesized that the instrument is reliable and shows factorial as well as convergent validity.

Methods: Within the framework of a multisite, randomized-controlled clinical trial, comparing the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Analyses System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and supportive psychotherapy (SP) in the treatment of early onset persistently depressed outpatients, the HAQ was filled out by patients (n = 255) and therapists (n = 81). 66.0% of patients were female; average age at randomization was 44.9 years (SD = 11.8). Several confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test different structures for the HAQ. In addition, correlations between the HAQ and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) were calculated to test for convergent validity.

Results: Goodness of fit indices for both a model with two different but strongly related factors named 'relation to the patient/ therapist ' and 'satisfaction with therapeutic outcome' and a second model with only one global helping alliance factor were comparable: Chi-Square-based indices rejected the models; RMSEA closely approached the threshold of good model fit, and CFI/ TLI and SRMR suggested that both models sufficiently fit the data. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) calculated for the different scales of the HAQ ranges between questionable to good. Finally, the HAQ scores were significantly related to some of the IIP scores.

Conclusions: The German versions of the HAQ offer sufficient reliable instruments for the quick assessment of different facets of the therapeutic alliance. The HAQ global scores can be used as indicators for the global impression of the patients and therapists perception of the quality of the therapeutic alliance. However, the small correlations found between the IIP and the HAQ puts the question of external validity into perspective.

Trial Registration: This study analysed data from a RCT which was registered on ClinicalTrials.com ( NCT00970437 ). First submitted on September 1, 2009.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914037PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1697-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

helping alliance
12
alliance questionnaire
12
therapeutic alliance
12
haq
9
psychometric properties
8
alliance
6
patients
5
german version
4
version helping
4
questionnaire psychometric
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Chronic pain is common among Veterans, some of whom use cannabis for pain. We conducted a feasibility pilot study of a novel coaching intervention to help Veterans optimize use of medical cannabis products for pain management (NCT06320470).

Methods: The intervention drew from scientific literature, consultation with cannabis experts, Veteran input via a Community Advisory Board, and tenets of motivational interviewing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The internet is a key source of health information, but the quality of content from popular search engines varies, posing challenges for users-especially those with low health or digital health literacy. To address this, the "tala-med" search engine was developed in 2020 to provide access to high-quality, evidence-based content. It prioritizes German health websites based on trustworthiness, recency, user-friendliness, and comprehensibility, offering category-based filters while ensuring privacy by avoiding data collection and advertisements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patient engagement is a critical but challenging public health priority in behavioral health care. During telehealth sessions, health care providers need to rely predominantly on verbal strategies rather than typical nonverbal cues to effectively engage patients. Hence, the typical patient engagement behaviors are now different, and health care provider training on telehealth patient engagement is unavailable or quite limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Building Family Medicine Research Through Community Engagement: Leveraging Federal Awards to Develop Infrastructure.

J Am Board Fam Med

January 2025

From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Health, 303 George Street, Matrix Plaza 1, Room 614, New Brunswick, NJ (AFT, JMF, MEJ, MP, MFC, EJ, SVH); New Jersey Alliance for Clinical and Translational Science, New Brunswick, NJ (AFT, DH, MEJ, SVH); Office of University-Community Partnerships, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ (DH); Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (MEJ); Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, New Brunswick, NJ, USA (SVH).

Many academic departments and programs struggle with the challenge of how to begin a meaningful research program. A useful place to start is with the work they already are doing in communities. Using work in practices and other clinical venues as a springboard can build helpful relationships that can catalyze research and build infrastructure that matters to family medicine clinicians, researchers, and the communities they serve.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!