Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestone Project for general surgery provided a more robust method for developing and tracking residents' competence. This framework enhanced systematic and progressive development of residents' competencies in surgical quality improvement.

Study Design: A 22-month interactive, educational program based on resident-specific surgical outcomes data culminated in a quality improvement project for postgraduate year 4 surgery residents. Self- assessment, quality knowledge test, and resident-specific American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Quality In-Training Initiative morbidity were compared before and after the intervention.

Results: Quality in-training initiative morbidity decreased from 25% (82/325) to 18% (93/517), p = 0.015 despite residents performing more complex cases. All participants achieved level 4 competency (4/4) within the general surgery milestones improvement of care, practice-based learning and improvement competency. Institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program general surgery morbidity improved from the ninth to the sixth decile. Quality assessment and improvement self-assessment postintervention scores (M = 23.80, SD = 4.97) were not significantly higher than preintervention scores (M = 19.20, SD = 5.26), p = 0.061. Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool postintervention test scores (M = 17.4, SD = 4.88), were not significantly higher than pretest scores (M = 13.2, SD = 1.92), p = 0.12.

Conclusion: Sharing validated resident-specific clinical data with participants was associated with improved surgical outcomes. Participating fourth year surgical residents achieved the highest score, a level 4, in the practice based learning and improvement competency of the improvement of care practice domain and observed significantly reduced surgical morbidity for cases in which they participated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality improvement
16
general surgery
12
surgical quality
12
quality
10
improvement
9
surgical outcomes
8
american college
8
college surgeons
8
surgeons national
8
national surgical
8

Similar Publications

Background: The results of many large randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have transformed clinical practice in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal hiatal hernia (HH). However, research waste (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Individuals with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may live with their disease for many years. We initiated the Johns Hopkins Hope at Hopkins Clinic to assess the needs and optimize the care of these patients.

Patients And Methods: Patients with MBC who agreed to participate in the Clinic in addition to usual care completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To date there has been no evaluation of further training and working conditions in medical specialist training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany. In order to counteract the lack of young talent and ensure long-term care for patients, quality assurance is essential.

Aim Of The Work: The evaluation aims to identify strengths and weaknesses of the further training and to derive measures for improvement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Peer Audit and Feedback: A Documentation-Focused Quality Improvement Project.

Qual Manag Health Care

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Department of Medical Staff Quality, Corporate Quality, Atrium Health Waxhaw, North Carolina (Dr Glass); School of Nursing, College of Health and Human Services, UNC Charlotte Charlotte, North Carolina (Dr Powers); School of Nursing, College of Health & Human Services, UNC Charlotte Charlotte, North Carolina (Dr Magennis), and Nursing Excellence, Enterprise Nursing, Atrium Health Nursing Administration (Dr Shaw).

Background And Objectives: Nurses' documentation of communication, including notification of critical laboratory results (CLR), is important to ensure safe, high-quality care. Evidence supports peer audit with feedback as a quality improvement (QI) intervention to improve documentation. Nursing compliance with CLR documentation requirements was below goal for several years in an intensive care unit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: can we do better?

Curr Opin Oncol

January 2025

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Purpose Of Review: Although the management of nausea and vomiting induced by cancer treatments has evolved, several questions remain unanswered.

Recent Findings: New antiemetics have been developed these last decades with therapeutic indications to be defined according to the anticancer regimen and partly as a consequence of the assessment of individual patient risk factors. Guidelines still seem to have a low level of knowledge and compliance, with a role for scientific societies in term of dissemination and education.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!