Explicit versus implicit evaluation to detect inappropriate medication use in geriatric outpatients.

Aging Male

Istanbul Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Published: September 2020

The rates and reasons why clinicians decide not to follow recommendations from explicit-criteria have been studied scarce. We aimed to compare STOPP version 2 representing one of the most commonly used excplicit tool with the implicit comprehensive geriatric assessment mediated clinical evaluation considered as gold standard. Two hundred and six ( = 206) outpatients ≥65 years old were included. The study was designed as retrospective, cross-sectional, and randomised. STOPP version 2 criteria were systematically used to assess pre-admission treatments followed by implicit clinical evaluation regarding two questions: Were the STOPP criteria recommendations valid for the individual patient and were there any potentially inappropriate-prescription other than depicted by STOPP version 2 criteria? The underlying reason(s) and associated clinical-features were noted. About 62.6% potentially inappropriate-prescriptions were identified (0.6 per-subject) according to systematic application of STOPP v2 while it was 53.4% (0.5 potentially inappropriate-prescriptions per subject) by clinician's application of STOPP v2. Prevalence of non-compliance was 14.7% in 18 (21.7%) of 83 patients identified by systematic application. Suggestion to stop a drug was not accepted because of need of treatment despite likelihood of anticipated side-effects in about 2/3 and with no-anticipated side-effects in about 1/3 of non-compliances. Not following STOPP v2 was significantly associated with lower functional level. According to clinician's implicit-evaluation, there were an extra 59.2% potentially inappropriate-prescriptions (0.6 per subject) in 80 (38.8%) patients yielding a total of 112.6% potentially inappropriate-prescription. Most of the STOPP v2 directed drug cessations are decided valid by the clinicians. In patients with higher functional dependency, it is likely that they are not followed due to palliation focussed care/patient-family preferences. There may be as much as STOPP v2 identified potentially inappropriate-prescriptions by implicit evaluation in a significant percent of geriatric patients signifying need for comprehensive geriatric evaluation in practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2018.1464552DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stopp version
12
stopp
9
implicit evaluation
8
comprehensive geriatric
8
clinical evaluation
8
systematic application
8
application stopp
8
inappropriate-prescriptions subject
8
evaluation
5
explicit versus
4

Similar Publications

Background: Various explicit screening tools, developed mostly in central Europe and the USA, assist clinicians in optimizing medication use for older adults. The Turkish Inappropriate Medication use in oldEr adults (TIME) criteria set, primarily based on the STOPP/START criteria set, is a current explicit tool originally developed for Eastern Europe and subsequently validated for broader use in Central European settings. Reviewed every three months to align with the latest scientific literature, it is one of the most up-to-date tools available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) is used to detect potentially inappropriate medication. Version 2 includes 80 criteria, whereof two can be considered implicit as their detection primarily relies on the assessor's expertise: (A1) drugs without indication and (A2) drug treatment beyond recommended duration. To explore the inter-rater agreement for detection of explicit and implicit criteria, data on consecutive primary care patients from a previous study (n = 302, 65-99 years of age) were used, including independent assessments of the 78 explicit criteria (23 556 assessments) and the two implicit criteria (604 assessments) by two specialist physicians.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the prevalence and patterns of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing (PIP) in older adults in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which is linked to patient safety risks and negative health outcomes.
  • A comprehensive analysis of 14 studies involving 18,647 patients shows a median PIP prevalence of 54.4%, with higher rates in hospitals compared to primary care settings, and cardiovascular drugs being the most frequently misprescribed.
  • The findings indicate that polypharmacy and chronic conditions like kidney disease and diabetes significantly increase the risk of PIP, highlighting the necessity for improved prescribing practices to enhance medication safety for older patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A study involving 19,705 patients age 65 and older revealed that 33% were prescribed FRIDs, with an overall fall incidence of 1.48%. The risk of falls was notably higher for those on FRIDs, especially among females and patients over 70.
  • * The results indicate a clear association between FRIDs and increased fall risks, emphasizing the importance of careful medication management in elderly patients to mitigate these risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Higher prevalence of inappropriate medication use among cancer patients increases risk of drug-related problems(DRP) like drug-drug interactions, ADR, and non-adherence. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and Potential Prescription Omission (PPO) were identified using Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) and Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to the Right Treatment (START) criteria. The study objective was to optimize prescriptions for the elderly by analyzing the impact of medication review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!