AI Article Synopsis

  • The study highlights the importance of flow cytometry in diagnosing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and examines how various pre-analytical factors impact these results.
  • Significant differences were found in the immunophenotype of samples depending on the type of anticoagulant used, with delayed processing affecting K-EDTA samples more than Na-heparin.
  • The findings suggest that delays can lead to misinterpretations, emphasizing the need to focus on stable markers if immediate analysis isn't feasible.

Article Abstract

Introduction: A growing body of evidence supports the usefulness of dysplastic signs detected by flow cytometry in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Our aim was to assess the impact of pre-analytical variables (delayed sample handling, type of anticoagulant, and different clones of antibody) in the interpretation of flow cytometric results.

Material And Methods: Bone marrow samples were labelled and analysed immediately after aspiration and on two consecutive days. The effect of anticoagulant type was evaluated in 16 bone marrow samples. Thirty-seven different immunophenotypic variables were recorded after eight-colour staining. Furthermore, 8 normal peripheral blood samples collected in K-EDTA and Na-heparin were examined with different clones of CD11b antibodies and four parameters were recorded with both anticoagulants on two consecutive days.

Results: Fourteen significant differences were detected in the initial immunophenotype of fresh samples collected in K-EDTA and Na-heparin. Regardless of the anticoagulant type, eleven parameters remained stable despite delayed sample handling. Due to delayed sample processing, more alterations were detected in the samples collected in K-EDTA than in the samples collected in Na-heparin. The type of CD11b clone influenced the reduction of fluorescence intensity only in samples collected in K-EDTA, where the alterations were contrary to the changes observed in Na-heparin.

Conclusions: Delayed sample processing causes considerable immunohenotypic alterations, which can lead to false interpretation of the results. If delayed sample evaluation is unavoidable, markers that remain more stable over time should be considered with more weight in the diagnosis of MDS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5898953PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.020704DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delayed sample
24
samples collected
20
collected k-edta
16
sample handling
12
handling type
8
type anticoagulant
8
dysplastic signs
8
signs detected
8
detected flow
8
flow cytometry
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!