Physician awareness of decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries.

Neurosciences (Riyadh)

Department of Neurosurgery, Critical Care Medicine and Interventional Radiology, King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al Khobar, University of Dammam, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail:

Published: April 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to gather insights from different medical specialties (neurology, neurosurgery, and intensive care) on the practice of decompressive craniectomy (DH) in patients with strokes in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region.
  • An electronic survey was conducted with 89 participating physicians, revealing diverse perspectives on referral triggers, perceived outcomes, and criteria for defining acceptable clinical results following DH.
  • The findings indicated a need for standardized guidelines and better education initiatives among specialties, as there were significant variations in opinions regarding patient selection and the expected benefits of DH, especially concerning age and stroke characteristics.

Article Abstract

Objective: To explore the perspective on Decompressive craniectomy (DH) of each of these specialties to establish common grounds for improved clinical practice.

Methods: An electronic survey was distributed via email and social media groups to members of these specialties in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries. Local practices, common triggers for referral for DH, perceived outcomes of these procedures, individual impression of what constitutes good clinical outcomes were explored.

Results: There are 89 physicians participated: 41 (46.1%) neurologists, 34 (38.2%) neurosurgeons, and 14 (15.7%) intensivests. Participants are mostly practicing in intermediate volume centers or high volume centers. Half of the neurosurgeons preferred to be consulted immediately on candidates with large middle cerebral artery (MCA) strokes. The most important referral trigger for DH was clinical changes. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) cutoff for good clinical outcome was 3 for 73.6% of respondents. There was agreement that DH only improves survival (64.4%). A third of the neurologists considered it to improve functional outcome compared to 15.4% of intensivests and 14.8% of neurosurgeons. There was agreement (66.7%) that patients older than 60 years with involvement of more than one territory should be excluded from DH. Only 7.7% of neurosurgeons excluded patients with dominant hemispheric strokes.

Conclusion: Our physicians` views are variable in what`s called acceptable outcome, and further studies are needed to to test the characteristics that helps in decision making such as hemisphere dominancy, time onset of stroke and vital radiological signs. This is seen despite the literature being full of data that supports the DC over medical management in malignant MCA infarction. Better multidisciplinary education initiatives are needed to unify the understanding and help improve the practices in this challenging subset of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8015448PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2018.2.20170148DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

middle cerebral
8
cerebral artery
8
saudi arabia
8
arabia gulf
8
gulf countries
8
good clinical
8
volume centers
8
physician awareness
4
awareness decompressive
4
decompressive hemicraniectomy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!