Longitudinal Assessment of Vascular Function With Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Circ Heart Fail

From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (A.B.C., J.C.F.) and Division of Oncology (N.A.), Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (R.A.H., B.K.), Division of Cardiology (J.A.C., D.H., A.M.S., T.P., V.E., B.K.), Division of Hematology and Oncology (S.K., N.B.H., V.N.), and Division of Nephrology (R.T.), Department of Medicine, and Abramson Cancer Center (S.K., N.B.H., V.N., B.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY (I.P.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison (S.E.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (C.E.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (M.G.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, MO (D.L.).

Published: March 2018

Background: Sunitinib, used widely in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, can result in hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, and heart failure. However, the relationships between vascular function and cardiac dysfunction with sunitinib are poorly understood.

Methods And Results: In a multicenter prospective study of 84 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients, echocardiography, arterial tonometry, and BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) measures were performed at baseline and at 3.5, 15, and 33 weeks after sunitinib initiation, correlating with sunitinib cycles 1, 3, and 6. Mean change in vascular function parameters and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Linear regression models were used to estimate associations between vascular function and left ventricular ejection fraction, longitudinal strain, diastolic function (E/e'), and BNP. After 3.5 weeks of sunitinib, mean systolic blood pressure increased by 9.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 2.0-17.1; =0.02) and diastolic blood pressure by 7.2 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 4.3-10.0; <0.001) across all participants. Sunitinib resulted in increases in large artery stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) and resistive load (total peripheral resistance and arterial elastance; all <0.05) and changes in pulsatile load (total arterial compliance and wave reflection). There were no statistically significant associations between vascular function and systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction and longitudinal strain). However, baseline total peripheral resistance, arterial elastance, and aortic impedance were associated with worsening diastolic function and filling pressures over time.

Conclusions: In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, sunitinib resulted in early, significant increases in blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and resistive and pulsatile load within 3.5 weeks of treatment. Baseline vascular function parameters were associated with worsening diastolic but not systolic function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6360089PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004408DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vascular function
16
metastatic renal
12
renal cell
12
cell carcinoma
12
95% confidence
12
left ventricular
8
weeks sunitinib
8
blood pressure
8
mm hg 95%
8
confidence interval
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!