Purpose: To assess pediatric dentists' choice for restoring Class II carious lesions in primary molars.

Methods: A survey with eight cases of class II carious lesions was emailed to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry members, who were asked to choose either a stainless steel crown (SSC) or composite resin as a final restoration, or no treatment. Treatment decisions were compared to evidence-based treatment recommendations. Repeated measures logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with treatment decisions.

Results: The response rate was 11 percent (n=729). Approximately two-thirds of responses aligned with current evidence-based treatment. Both patient and provider characteristics were associated with the treatment plan. Clinically detectable caries and those restored under general anesthesia were treated more often with an SSC. Faculty and residents, along with providers with less than 10 years' experience, chose an SSC more often.

Conclusions: Due to the multifactorial nature of treatment planning for the pediatric dental patient, more evidence-based research is needed to unify treatment planning modalities and increase evidence-based treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment planning
12
class carious
12
carious lesions
12
evidence-based treatment
12
treatment
10
pediatric dentists'
8
lesions primary
8
associated treatment
8
pediatric
4
dentists' treatment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!