Background: Free flap monitoring in autologous reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy remains controversial. The authors therefore examined outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy with buried free flap reconstruction versus free flap reconstruction incorporating a monitoring skin paddle.
Methods: Autologous free flap reconstructions with nipple-sparing mastectomy performed from 2006 to 2015 were identified. Demographics and operative results were analyzed and compared between buried flaps and those with a skin paddle for monitoring.
Results: Two hundred twenty-one free flaps for nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction were identified: 50 buried flaps and 171 flaps incorporating a skin paddle. The most common flaps used were deep inferior epigastric perforator (64 percent), profunda artery perforator (12.1 percent), and muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (10.4 percent). Patients undergoing autologous reconstructions with a skin paddle had a significantly greater body mass index (p = 0.006). Mastectomy weight (p = 0.017) and flap weight (p < 0.0001) were significantly greater in flaps incorporating a skin paddle. Comparing outcomes, there were no significant differences in flap failure (2.0 percent versus 2.3 percent; p = 1.000) or percentage of flaps requiring return to the operating room (6.0 percent versus 4.7 percent; p = 0.715) between groups. Buried flaps had an absolute greater mean number of revision procedures per nipple-sparing mastectomy (0.82) compared with the skin paddle group (0.44); however, rates of revision procedures per nipple-sparing mastectomy were statistically equivalent between the groups (p = 0.296).
Conclusion: Although buried free flap reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy has been shown to be safe and effective, the authors' technique has evolved to favor incorporating a skin paddle, which allows for clinical monitoring and can be removed at the time of secondary revision.
Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004271 | DOI Listing |
Surg Oncol
December 2024
College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA; Department of Surgery, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA; University Hospitals NEOMED Faculty Scholar, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. Electronic address:
Background: The common techniques used in nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are hydrodissection (tumescent dissection) and electrocautery. We hypothesized that bipolar scissors (diathermy scissors) would improve surgical outcomes in mastectomy.
Methods: We prospectively compared 50 patients undergoing NSM using the bipolar scissor technique to retrospective data from patients who had previously undergone NSM with hydrodissection (n = 50) or electrocautery (n = 50).
Ann Surg Oncol
December 2024
Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyüan, Taiwan, R.O.C..
Background: We investigated the perioperative outcome and oncologic safety of performing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) through a single axillary incision (NSM-SAI) compared with performing NSM through a conventional incision (NSM-C).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 725 patients who underwent NSM for breast cancer between January 2010 and December 2023; 333 patients who underwent NSM with immediate reconstruction (IR) were enrolled. Surgical outcomes and oncologic outcomes of NSM-C (n = 184), NSM performed through SAI with a freehand approach (NSM-SAI-F; n = 92), and with an endoscopic approach (NSM-SAI-E; n = 57) were demonstrated.
Cureus
November 2024
Respiratory Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, GBR.
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide. Despite significant advancements in breast cancer treatments over the past decade, late recurrence, a hallmark of breast cancer, remains a major challenge for oncologists. In this case report, we present an atypical presentation of late breast cancer recurrence as a peri-bronchial lesion manifesting as dysphagia 14 years after completing treatment for primary breast cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
November 2024
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, USA.
Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) is a benign but rare mesenchymal proliferation of the mammary stroma, characterized by pseudovascular spaces within a hyperplastic matrix. PASH can be classified as either non-tumor-forming or tumor-forming. The non-tumor-forming type is an infiltrative and clinically undetectable mass, incidentally found in approximately a quarter of breast biopsies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Clin Cases
December 2024
Division of General Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gigantomastia is a rare condition characterized by excessive breast enlargement, which can lead to physical and psychological distress. Gestational gigantomastia (GG) occurs during pregnancy, often presenting significant management challenges. This case contributes to the limited literature on GG management by highlighting the successful use of the Goldilocks technique combined with free nipple grafting, offering insights into an effective surgical approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!