A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Real-time intracochlear imaging of automated cochlear implant insertions in whole decalcified cadaver cochleas using ultrasound. | LitMetric

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of combining high-frequency ultrasound imaging, automated insertion, and force sensing to yield more information about cochlear implant insertion dynamics.

Methods: An apparatus was developed combining these aspects along with software to control implant and imaging probe positions. Decalcified unfixed human cochleas were implanted at various speeds, insertion sites, and implant models while imaging near the implant tip throughout insertion and recording force data from the cochlea mounting stage. Ultrasound video data were also captured.

Results: The basilar membrane (BM) was frequently penetrated by the implant in either the mid-basal or lower middle turn. Measurements were also performed of apical BM motion in response to upstream implant movement at varying insertion speeds. Increasing insertion speed resulted in greater BM displacement.

Discussion: Multiple insertions per cochlea increase the volume of data per specimen while also reducing variability due to differences between cochleas. However, to image inside the cochlea with ultrasound, the bone had to be decalcified, which likely had a significant effect upon the response of tissue to contact by the implant. As calcified bone strongly reflects ultrasound, we also found ultrasound imaging to be an excellent method for easily assessing bone decalcification progress.

Conclusion: This technique may be very useful for some studies, although the confounding effects of bone decalcification may make results of other studies too difficult to generalize. The approach could be adapted to other real-time imaging modalities, such as optical coherence tomography.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2018.1460024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imaging automated
8
implant
8
cochlear implant
8
ultrasound imaging
8
implant insertion
8
bone decalcification
8
imaging
6
ultrasound
6
insertion
6
real-time intracochlear
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!