Background: Renal transplant patients have a higher risk for malignancies of the renal transplant. In most cases suspected renal malignancies will be detected during the regular ultrasound follow-up and will require cross-sectional imaging to rule out a malignant aetiology. But it is well known that contrast agents for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging are critical in patients with limited renal function.

Objective: This study aims to compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and gold standard imaging modalities in characterizing suspected renal transplant malignancies in renal transplant patients.

Methods: A total of 22 renal transplant patients who underwent one or more CEUS examinations and at least one standard imaging modality (CT or MRI) between 2005 and 2017 were included. Patient ages ranged from 28.2 years to 74.6 (mean age 55.7 years; SD±13.0 years). CEUS of 22 patients was correlated with a standard imaging modality, CT (15 out of 22) or MRI (7 out of 22), serving as gold standard.

Results: CEUS showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 94.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 80%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%.

Conclusions: CEUS is an eligible method to help characterizing suspected renal malignancies in renal transplant patients compared to the well-established imaging modalities CT and MRI. As an imaging modality with no nephrotoxic effects CEUS can be used repeatedly even in patients with limited renal function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CH-189114DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

renal transplant
32
suspected renal
16
malignancies renal
16
transplant patients
16
standard imaging
16
renal
12
imaging modalities
12
imaging modality
12
contrast-enhanced ultrasound
8
ultrasound ceus
8

Similar Publications

Liver metastases from melanomas, sarcomas, and renal tumors are less frequent. Treatment and prognosis will depend on whether they are isolated or multiple, size and location, the presence or absence of extrahepatic neoplastic disease, age, stage of the initial disease, initial treatments instituted, time of evolution, and clinical condition of the patient. Recently, a high number of oncological therapies including monotherapy or in combination, neoadjuvants or adjuvants, and immuno-oncological treatments have been developed and tested, increasing disease-free time and survival.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Donor-derived Cryptococcus gattii complex infection after liver transplantation.

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop

January 2025

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Programa de pós-graduação em Medicina Interna e Ciências da Saúde, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Cryptococcal disease is the third most common invasive fungal infection in solid organ transplant recipients and is associated with high-morbidity and -mortality rates. Donor-derived Cryptococcus spp. infection typically manifests within the first month post-procedure and has historically been caused by C.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Despite the relevance of kidney transplantation, the supply of organs and the process for inclusion in its waiting list still represent obstacles. This study aimed to analyze the performance of dialysis centers in referring patients for pre-kidney transplant evaluation and inclusion in the waiting list of incident dialysis patients from 2015 to 2019 in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. This retrospective cohort study sampled 23,297 records of patients who underwent dialysis therapy in public or philanthropic institutions or who had their treatment funded by the Brazilian Unified National Health System in private clinics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses a significant risk to kidney transplant recipients. This study investigated CMV disease incidence, outcomes, and management challenges in racial and ethnic minority populations following kidney transplantation.

Methods: This single-center, mixed-methods study included a retrospective cohort analysis of kidney transplant recipients (n = 58) and qualitative surveys of healthcare providers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: KEPs (kidney exchange programs) facilitate living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT) for patients with incompatible donors, who are typically higher risk than non-KEP patients because of higher sensitization and longer dialysis vintage. We conducted a comparative analysis of graft outcomes and risk factors for both KEP and non-KEP living donor kidney transplants.

Methods: All LDKTs performed in the Netherlands between 2004-2021 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!