A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study. | LitMetric

Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is increased during laparoscopic surgery with Trendelenburg position and may contribute to deleterious effects on optic nerve in susceptible patients.

Aims: The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with those of sevoflurane anesthesia on IOP in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position. Secondary objectives are to compare hemodynamic changes, mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal CO, and peak inspiratory pressure changes.

Materials And Methods: Sixty patients with physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I and II were randomly allocated in two groups: Group A (propofol) and Group B (sevoflurane). IOP along with other parameters was measured at seven points including baseline (T0), 5 min after induction (T1), 5 min after CO pneumoperitoneum in supine position (T2), 30 min after CO pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position (T3), 5 min after returning to supine position (T4), 5 min after CO desufflation (T5), and 5 min after extubation (T6).

Results: The change in IOP was different between the two groups. Maximum rise in IOP was seen at T3, and mean ± standard deviation IOP was 15.5 ± 0.9 mmHg and 19.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in Group A and Group B, respectively ( < 0.01). In Group A (propofol), IOP remained almost equal to the baseline value at T3 and the IOP difference was 0.3 ± 0.9 mmHg less than baseline (statistically insignificant, > 0.05), while in Group B (sevoflurane), IOP increased significantly at T3 and the difference was 4.0 ± 1.2 mmHg ( < 0.001). The IOP was significantly greater ( < 0.01) from T2 to T6 in sevoflurane group than propofol group.

Conclusion: Propofol-based TIVA is more effective than inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane in attenuating the increase in IOP during laparoscopic surgery requiring CO pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872896PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_177_17DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trendelenburg position
20
laparoscopic surgery
16
surgery trendelenburg
12
group propofol
12
position min
12
iop
11
intraocular pressure
8
propofol-based total
8
total intravenous
8
intravenous anesthesia
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!