Right atrial dual-loop reentrant tachycardia after cardiac surgery: Prevalence, electrophysiological characteristics, and ablation outcomes.

Heart Rhythm

State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Published: August 2018

Background: Right atrial (RA) dual-loop reentrant tachycardia has been described in patients who have undergone open heart surgery. However, the prevalence, electrophysiological (EP) substrate, and ablation outcomes have been poorly characterized.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence, EP substrate, and ablation outcomes for RA dual-loop reentrant tachycardia after cardiac surgery.

Methods: We identified all patients with atrial tachycardia (AT) after cardiac surgery. We compared EP findings and outcomes of those with RA dual-loop reentrant tachycardia to a control group of patients with RA macroreentrant arrhythmias in the setting of linear RA free-wall (FW) scar.

Results: Of the 127 patients with 152 postsurgical ATs, 28 of the ATs (18.4%) had RA dual-loop reentry and 24 of 28 (85.7%) had tricuspid annular reentry combined with FW incisional reentry. An incision length >51.5 mm along the FW predicted the substrate for a second loop. In 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) with initial ablation in the cavotricuspid isthmus, a change in the interval between Halo to CS could be recorded, and 15 of 23 patients (65.2%) had coronary sinus activation pattern change. Complete success was achieved in 25 of 28 patients (89.3%) in the dual-loop reentry group and in 64 of 69 patients (92.8%) in the control group. After mean follow-up of 33.9 ± 24.2 months, 24 of 28 patients (85.7%) and 60 of 69 patients (86.95%) were free of arrhythmias after the initial procedure in the 2 groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The prevalence of RA dual-loop reentry is 18.4% of ATs with prior atriotomy scar. A long incision should alert physicians to the possibility of a second loop at the FW. Halo and coronary sinus activation patterns provide important clues to circuit transformation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.03.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dual-loop reentrant
16
reentrant tachycardia
16
tachycardia cardiac
12
ablation outcomes
12
dual-loop reentry
12
patients
10
atrial dual-loop
8
cardiac surgery
8
surgery prevalence
8
prevalence electrophysiological
8

Similar Publications

Atrial flutter (AFL), defined as macro-re-entrant atrial tachycardia, is associated with debilitating symptoms, stroke, heart failure, and increased mortality. AFL is classified into typical, or cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent, and atypical, or non-CTI-dependent. Atypical AFL is a heterogenous group of re-entrant atrial tachycardias that most commonly occur in patients with prior heart surgery or catheter ablation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Atypical atrial flutter (AFL) can be challenging to ablate, especially when involving dual-loop re-entry. We sought to assess the electroanatomical characteristics of single- and dual-loop AFLs in patients undergoing catheter ablation. We analyzed 25 non-cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent macro-re-entrant AFL in 19 consecutive patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Atypical atrial flutters often involve complex circuits. Classic methods of identifying ablation targets, including detailed electroanatomical mapping and entrainment within a well-defined isthmus, may not always be sufficient to allow the critical isthmus to be delineated and ablated, with flutter termination and prevention of reinduction.

Objectives: This study sought a systematic method to classify conduction barriers and isthmuses as critical or noncritical that would improve understanding and ablation success.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates Directed Graph Mapping (DGM) as a new method for identifying mechanisms and crucial components in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, comparing its accuracy to traditional mapping techniques and an automated conduction mapping tool.
  • Results showed strong agreement between DGM and the gold standard traditional mapping (TM), with a kappa value of 0.79, indicating DGM’s effectiveness in discerning VT mechanisms and circuits.
  • DGM and the automated tool correctly identified the critical VT isthmus in 89% of re-entrant cases, demonstrating DGM's potential as a faster, reliable option for VT analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Multiple re-entry circuits may operate simultaneously in the atria in the form of dual loop re-entry using a common isthmus, or multiple re-entrant loops without a common isthmus. When two or more re-entrant circuits coexist, ablation of an individual isthmus may lead to a seamless transition (without significant changes in surface electrocardiogram, coronary sinus activation or tachycardia cycle length) to a second rhythm, and the isthmus block can go unnoticed.

Methods And Results: We hypothesize and subsequently illustrate in three patient cases, methods to rapidly identify a transition in the rhythm and isthmus block using local electrogram changes at the ablation site.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!