There are currently two methods to evaluate comedogenecity. One is the inexpensive human model developed by Mills and Kligman and modified by others. The second is the more costly human clinical trial, which is the gold standard for comedogenesis and to which the human model is compared. The qualification of each method to support the comedogenecity claim is evaluated and contrasted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
human model
8
non-comedogenic non-acnegenic
4
non-acnegenic claim
4
claim substantiation
4
substantiation currently
4
currently methods
4
methods evaluate
4
evaluate comedogenecity
4
comedogenecity inexpensive
4
inexpensive human
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!