Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Skin localization occurs in about 25% of women with metastatic breast cancer and represents a major therapeutic challenge. Although clinical literature on response of cutaneous metastases to chemotherapy is scarce, good response to eribulin has been reported. Herein, the clinical courses of three women with skin lesions secondary to metastatic breast cancer are described. The first patient achieved a complete clinical response in skin metastases with good tolerability to fourth-line eribulin (progression-free survival [PFS]: 8.5 months). In the second case, eribulin administered as fifth-line chemotherapy produced an objective response and PFS of 6 months with good tolerability. The third patient also received eribulin in the fifth line and had a visible skin response from the first administration (PFS: 5 months).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fon-2017-0360 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!