A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Elevated visceral obesity quantified by CT is associated with adverse postoperative outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal clear cell carcinoma patients. | LitMetric

Purpose: To examine the association between CT measures of visceral obesity and short-term postoperative outcomes in renal clear cell carcinoma (RCCC) patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 76 patients treated with unilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for stage I-III renal cancer were classified as obese or non-obese by preoperative CT-based measures of adiposity [obese: visceral fat area (VFA) > 100 cm, BMI ≥ 28 kg/m]. Clinical variables, Fuhrman grade, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative complications, postoperative stay, drainage time and hospitalization expenses were compared between the two groups.

Results: Viscerally obese patients significantly had higher Fuhrman grade than the non-obese (p = 0.018). The operation time of obese patients by VFA or BMI was more than the non-obese (171.6 ± 68.9 vs. 140.8 ± 35.5 min, p = 0.012 and 197.2 ± 67.2 vs. 153.2 ± 57.7 min, p = 0.013, respectively). And obese patients by VFA or BMI tended to have more EBL than non-obese (132.0 ± 120.7 vs. 83.8 ± 53.4 ml, p = 0.018 and 215.3 ± 165.0 vs. 92.5 ± 68.8 ml, p = 0.013, respectively). Viscerally obese patients by VFA (not BMI) were more likely to develop postoperative complications as compared to patients classified as non-obese: VFA (26.9 vs. 4.2%, p = 0.045) and BMI (33.3 vs. 16.4%, p =0.265). Furthermore, obese patients by VFA (not BMI) were more likely to have longer postoperative stay: VFA (8.7 ± 2.5 vs. 7.5 ± 1.4 dollars, p = 0.013) and BMI (9.1 ± 2.9 vs. 8.1 ± 2.1 dollars, p = 0.209). Obese patients expensed more than non-obese: VFA (7570.9 ± 2674.3 vs. 6368.8 ± 1289.8 dollars, p = 0.040) and BMI (8390.8 ± 2929.7 vs. 6896.3 ± 2159.1 dollars, p = 0.029).

Conclusions: Elevated visceral obesity by VFA is associated with increased surgical complexity, postoperative morbidity, postoperative stay and hospitalization expenses for RCCC patients and may be superior to BMI for renal cancer outcome assessment. VFA may be a useful index for the evaluation and calculation of RCCC aggressiveness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1858-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

obese patients
24
patients vfa
16
vfa bmi
16
visceral obesity
12
postoperative stay
12
patients
10
vfa
9
elevated visceral
8
postoperative
8
laparoscopic radical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!