AI Article Synopsis

  • Diesel particulate matter (DPM) exposure measurement varies, with potential interference from organic carbon (OC), raising questions about the reliability of direct-reading instruments (DRI) in this context.
  • * The study focused on underground mines, using filter methods and DRI to assess DPM exposure and the correlation between measures of elemental carbon (EC) and DRI results.
  • * Results indicated that personal samples exhibited higher TCEC ratios and weaker EC-TC associations than ambient samples; DRI instruments showed varying effectiveness, with the Airtec providing strong associations for EC measurements.

Article Abstract

Exposure to diesel particulate matter (DPM) is frequently assessed by measuring indicators of carbon speciation, but these measurements may be affected by organic carbon (OC) interference. Furthermore, there are still questions regarding the reliability of direct-reading instruments (DRI) for measuring DPM, since these instruments are not specific and may be interfered by other aerosol sources. This study aimed to assess DPM exposure in 2 underground mines by filter-based methods and DRI and to assess the relationship between the measures of elemental carbon (EC) and the DRI to verify the association of these instruments to DPM. Filter-based methods of respirable combustible dust (RCD), EC, and total carbon (TC) were used to measure levels of personal and ambient DPM. For ambient measurements, DRI were used to monitor particle number concentration (PNC; PTrak), particle mass concentration (DustTrak DRX and DustTrak 8520), and the submicron fraction of EC (ECAirtec). The association between ambient EC and the DRI was assessed by Spearman correlation. Geometric mean concentrations of RCD, respirable TC (TC) and respirable elemental EC (EC) were 170 µg/m, 148 µg/m, and 83 µg/m for personal samples, and 197 µg/m, 151 µg/m, and 100 µg/m for ambient samples. Personal measurements had higher TCEC ratios compared to ambient samples (1.8 vs. 1.50) and weaker association between EC and TC. Among the DRI, the measures of EC by the Airtec (ρ = 0.86; P < 0.001) and the respirable particles by the DustTrak 8520 (ρ = 0.74; P < 0.001) showed the strongest association with EC, while PNC showed a weak and non-significant association with EC. In conclusion, this study provided important information about the concentrations of DPM in underground mines by measuring several indicators using filter-based methods and DRI. Among the DRI, the Airtec proved to be a good tool for estimating EC concentrations and, although the DustTrak showed good association with EC, interferences from other aerosol sources should be considered when using this instrument to assess DPM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2018.1459044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

underground mines
12
filter-based methods
12
exposure underground
8
measuring indicators
8
dri
8
aerosol sources
8
assess dpm
8
methods dri
8
dusttrak 8520
8
ambient samples
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!