AI Article Synopsis

  • Community-based participatory research (CBPR) fosters collaboration but can be tough to maintain, prompting the need for new strategies like the CBPR charrette model used by UNC in 2010 for health research engagement.
  • The CHAMPS study utilized the charrette process with 14 partners to identify strengths, needs, and challenges, while receiving guidance from experts in CBPR and health disparities.
  • The charrette improved trust, transparency, and accountability among the CHAMPS partners, enabling clearer communication and goal-setting, and highlighting the need for future comparisons of its effectiveness against other partnership-building methods.

Article Abstract

Background: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative and equitable approach to research inquiry; however, the process of establishing and maintaining CBPR partnerships can be challenging. There is an ongoing need for innovative strategies that foster partnership development and long-term sustainability. In 2010, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill developed a CBPR charrette model to facilitate stakeholder engagement in translational research.

Objective: To describe how the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms (CHAMPS) Study leveraged the CBPR charrette process to develop and strengthen its CBPR partnership and successfully implement research objectives.

Methods: Fourteen CHAMPS community, academic, and medical partners participated in the CBPR charrette. Two co-facilitators guided the charrette application process and in-person discussion of partnership strengths, needs, and challenges. Community experts (CEs) and academic experts (AEs) with extensive experience in CBPR and health disparities provided technical assistance and recommendations during the in-person charrette.

Conclusions: Overall, the CHAMPS partnership benefited significantly from the charrette process. Specifically, the charrette process engendered greater transparency, accountability, and trust among CHAMPS partners by encouraging collective negotiation of project goals and implementation, roles and responsibilities, and compensation and communication structures. The process also allowed for the exploration of newly identified challenges and potential solutions with support from CEs and AEs. Furthermore, the charrette also functioned as a catalyst for capacity building among CHAMPS community, academic, and medical partners. Future studies should compare the impact of the CBPR charrette, relative to other approaches, on partnership development and process evaluation outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542568PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2018.0010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cbpr charrette
16
community-based participatory
12
charrette process
12
charrette
9
charrette model
8
cancer health
8
health accountability
8
accountability managing
8
managing pain
8
pain symptoms
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!