A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in relation to anterior chamber depth in patients with normal axial lengths. | LitMetric

Accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in relation to anterior chamber depth in patients with normal axial lengths.

J Cataract Refract Surg

From the Cullen Eye Institute (Gökce, Montes De Oca, Wang, Koch, Al-Mohtaseb), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and the Great Lakes Eye Care (Cooke), Saint Joseph and the Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology (Cooke), Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA; the Department of Ophthalmology, Dünya Göz Hospital (Gökce), Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address:

Published: March 2018

Purpose: To determine the effect of anterior chamber depth (ACD) on the accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in patients with normal axial lengths (ALs).

Setting: Baylor College of Medicine, Alkek Eye center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: Patients having cataract surgery with ALs between 22.0 mm and 25.0 mm were divided into 3 groups based on their preoperative ACD measurement. The mean prediction errors, mean absolute errors (MAEs), and median absolute errors for each group were calculated.

Results: For the ACD of 3.0 mm or less group and the ACD of 3.5 mm or more group, the Barrett Universal II, Holladay 2, Haigis, and Olsen ray-tracing formulas had mean prediction error values that were not significantly different from zero. For the ACD of 3.01 to 3.49 mm group, all formulas had mean prediction error values that were not significantly different from zero. For the ACD of 3.0 mm or less group, the Barrett Universal II formula had a smaller median absolute error than the Haigis, Hoffer Q, and Olsen optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) (Lenstar) formulas and a smaller MAE than the Hoffer Q, Hill-RBF, and Olsen OLCR (P < .05). In the ACD of 3.5 mm or more group, the Barrett MAE was smaller than the Hoffer Q (P < .05); however, there were no significant differences between median absolute errors.

Conclusion: In eyes with normal ALs, taking preoperative ACD values into consideration might improve refractive outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

accuracy intraocular
8
intraocular lens
8
lens calculation
8
calculation formulas
8
anterior chamber
8
chamber depth
8
patients normal
8
normal axial
8
axial lengths
8
absolute errors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!