Harmonizing Biodiversity Conservation and Productivity in the Context of Increasing Demands on Landscapes.

Bioscience

Ralf Seppelt Michael Beckmann, Anna F. Cord, and Katharina Gerstner are affiliated with the Department of Computational Landscape Ecology at the UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, in Leipzig, Germany; RS is also with the Institute of Geoscience and Geography at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, in Germany. Silvia Ceauşu, Stefan Klotz, and Marten Winter are affiliated with iDiv, the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, in Leipzig, Germany; SC is also with the Institute for Biology at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, in Germany, and SK is also with the Department Community Ecology at the UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, in Germany. Jessica Gurevitch is affiliated with the Department of Ecology and Evolution at Stony Brook University, in New York. Stephan Kambach is with the Institute for Biology at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, and the Department of Community Ecology at the UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. Chase Mendenhall is affiliated with the Center for Conservation Biology and the Department of Biology at Stanford University, in California. Helen R. P. Phillips is with the Department of Life Sciences at Imperial College London and the Department of Life Sciences at the Natural History Museum, in London, United Kingdom. Kristin Powell is affiliated with the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, in Annapolis, Maryland. Peter H. Verburg and Willem Verhagen are affiliated with the Department of Earth Sciences at VU University Amsterdam, in The Netherlands. Tim Newbold is affiliated with the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, in Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Published: October 2016

Biodiversity conservation and agricultural production are often seen as mutually exclusive objectives. Strategies for reconciling them are intensely debated. We argue that harmonization between biodiversity conservation and crop production can be improved by increasing our understanding of the underlying relationships between them. We provide a general conceptual framework that links biodiversity and agricultural production through the separate relationships between land use and biodiversity and between land use and production. Hypothesized relationships are derived by synthesizing existing empirical and theoretical ecological knowledge. The framework suggests nonlinear relationships caused by the multifaceted impacts of land use (composition, configuration, and intensity). We propose solutions for overcoming the apparently dichotomous aims of maximizing either biodiversity conservation or agricultural production and suggest new hypotheses that emerge from our proposed framework.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5862251PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biodiversity conservation
16
agricultural production
12
conservation agricultural
8
biodiversity
5
production
5
harmonizing biodiversity
4
conservation
4
conservation productivity
4
productivity context
4
context increasing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!