Workplace Respiratory Protection Factors during Asbestos Removal Operations.

Ann Work Expo Health

Department of Metrology of Pollutants, Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité (INRS), Rue du Morvan, CS, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.

Published: May 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent changes in French labour regulations have focused on reducing asbestos exposure for workers, including updated methods for counting fibres and improved protective equipment.
  • A study evaluated the effectiveness of supplied-air respirators and powered air-purifying respirators at nine asbestos removal worksites, revealing that while the average exposure inside masks was low, significant risks remained during specific tasks.
  • Findings indicate a critical need for enhanced collective protective measures to better manage asbestos-related health risks on job sites.

Article Abstract

Numerous changes have been made to the French labour regulations in recent years relating to the prevention of risks of exposure to asbestos fibres for operators removing asbestos-containing materials. These changes refer to the method used to count fibres, the collective and personal protective devices to be used on these worksites, and the occupational exposure limit value, which was reduced to 10 f.L-1 on 2 July 2015. In this context, this study assessed the level of respiratory protection afforded by supplied-air respirators and powered air-purifying respirators by monitoring exposure for several operators on nine worksites. The levels of dustiness measured in personal samples taken outside masks showed significant evidence of potential exposure during removal of asbestos-containing plaster or sprayed asbestos, and when using abrasive blasting to treat asbestos-containing materials. For these tasks outside concentration regularly exceeds 25000 f.L-1. Measurements inside masks were generally low, under 10 f.L-1, except in some situations involving the removal of asbestos-containing plaster. This partial penetration of fibres inside masks could be due to the high loading linked to this material. The distributions of Workplace Protection Factors obtained for the two types of respiratory protective devices studied were broad, and the fifth percentile values equal to 236 and 104, respectively, for supplied-air respirators and powered air-purifying respirators. This work highlights once again the need to prioritize collective protection when seeking to prevent asbestos-related risks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

respiratory protection
8
protection factors
8
asbestos-containing materials
8
protective devices
8
supplied-air respirators
8
respirators powered
8
powered air-purifying
8
air-purifying respirators
8
removal asbestos-containing
8
asbestos-containing plaster
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!