The FAME Trials: Impact on Clinical Decision Making.

Interv Cardiol

University Heart Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Published: October 2016

Careful and stepwise evaluation of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) index has been performed over the years, culminating in the landmark Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plus Optimal Medical Treatment Versus Optimal Medical Treatment Alone in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (FAME II) trials. Findings from these studies demonstrated unequivocally the overall inadequacy of angiography versus FFR to correctly assess stenosis severity. Thus, proof of concept and clinical applicability was established beyond debate and will be discussed here.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5808511PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/icr.2016:14:3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fractional flow
12
fame trials
8
flow reserve
8
optimal medical
8
medical treatment
8
trials impact
4
impact clinical
4
clinical decision
4
decision making
4
making careful
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!