Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The Trail Making Test - Part B (TMT-B) is a commonly used executive control measure with a known floor effect, limiting the ability to distinguish impairment among individuals unable to complete this task in the standard time limit. Our group previously proposed the TMT-B Efficiency Score (TMT-Be), which captures performance variability among examinees who fail to complete the task. The present study assesses the TMT-Be in a longitudinal clinical sample.
Method: Data were collected via record review of veterans who underwent two clinical neuropsychological evaluations. We identified 30 veterans (mean age Visit 1:69 ± 8.7 years) who were unable to complete TMT-B during at least one evaluation (mean days between visits = 615). Two scoring systems were utilized to examine performance variability: TMT-Be and TMT-B Prorated Score (TMT-Bpr).
Results: TMT-Be distribution was less skewed, but more platykuric, compared to TMT-Bpr. TMT-Be and TMT-Bpr were highly correlated. Both metrics correlated with psychomotor speed and another executive task, but not confrontation naming, providing both convergent and discriminant evidence of validity. TMT-Be, but not TMT-Bpr, detected significant decline in performance longitudinally. Age and education were significant predictors of the TMT-Be, but not TMT-Bpr, difference scores.
Conclusions: Both metrics captured performance variability in a clinical sample and provided sufficient variance for examining floor-level performance on the TMT-B. TMT-Be appeared to be less prone to creating outliers and more likely to detect change. The results support the utility of the TMT-Be metric in research and clinical settings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy025 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!