Objective: There is limited information regarding changes in bone architecture following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in tibial fractal signature in the medial and lateral compartments following ACL injury and describe how these values change following ACL-reconstruction and return to activity.
Design: This was a prospective cohort study with a nested case-control analysis. ACL-injured subjects and matched controls were evaluated at pre-surgical baseline and post ACL reconstruction follow-up at a mean of 46 months. Serial Fractal Dimensions (FD) of tibial subchondral bone architecture were calculated in medial and lateral regions of interest in the horizontal and vertical dimensions.
Results: In the medial and lateral compartments, there were significant differences in the vertical FD signature for ACL-injured subjects at final follow-up, when compared to the contralateral healthy tibia (medial P < 0.0001; lateral P < 0.0001) and the control group (medial P = 0.01; lateral P < 0.0001). Similarly, in the lateral compartment, there were significant differences in the horizontal FD profile for ACL-injured subjects at final follow-up, when compared to the contralateral healthy tibia (P = 0.003) and the controls (P < 0.0001). There were no significant side-to-side differences in FDs among healthy control subjects in the medial or lateral compartments at baseline or final follow-up.
Conclusion: At 46-month follow-up, FD profiles are significantly different, and show an overall lower FD signature, for ACL-injured knees when compared to the contralateral healthy knee and uninjured controls. Additionally, this study provided the first side-to-side symmetry data of medial and lateral FD values in healthy controls.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962427 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.905 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Deep Learning Superresolution for Simultaneous Multislice Parallel Imaging-Accelerated Knee MRI Using Arthroscopy Validation.
Radiology
January 2025
From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1st Ave, 3rd Fl, Rm 313, New York, NY 10016 (S.S.W., J.V., R.K., E.H.P., J.F.); Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (S.S.W.); Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (J.V.); Department of Radiology, Hospital do Coraçao, São Paulo, Brazil (T.C.R.); Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), London, United Kingdom (D.D.); Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (B.F.); Department of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (E.H.P.); Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (E.H.P.); Medscanlagos Radiology, Cabo Frio, Brazil (A.S.); Centre for Data Analytics, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia (S.E.S.); Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany (I.B.); and Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (G.K.).
Background Deep learning (DL) methods can improve accelerated MRI but require validation against an independent reference standard to ensure robustness and accuracy. Purpose To validate the diagnostic performance of twofold-simultaneous-multislice (SMSx2) twofold-parallel-imaging (PIx2)-accelerated DL superresolution MRI in the knee against conventional SMSx2-PIx2-accelerated MRI using arthroscopy as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Adults with painful knee conditions were prospectively enrolled from December 2021 to October 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReasons Why Patients Do Not Return to Sport Post ACLReconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Multidiscip Healthc
January 2025
School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Background: Patients who incur an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have the intention of returning to sports at their pre-injury level; however, many do not return to the pre-injury level. This study aims to investigate the common factors that hinder patients from resuming sports activities following ACLR and to assess how these barriers impact their ability to return to sports. We hypothesized that patients' psychological factors, including fear of reinjury, would significantly influence their decision to return to sport after ACL reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction frequently present asymmetries in the sagittal plane dynamics when performing single leg jumps but their assessment is inaccessible to health-care professionals as it requires a complex and expensive system. With the development of deep learning methods for human pose detection, kinematics can be quantified based on a video and this study aimed to investigate whether a relatively simple 2D multibody model could predict relevant dynamic biomarkers based on the kinematics using inverse dynamics. Six participants performed ten vertical and forward single leg hops while the kinematics and the ground reaction force "GRF" were captured using an optoelectronic system coupled with a force platform.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMany options are available concerning the graft fixation in ACL reconstruction, one of them being a suspensory device. Our study aimed to compare the strength of two different devices of fixation (suspensory device vs screw) on the tibia. We enrolled 80 patients older than 18 years with an isolated ACL tear confirmed at the MRI, divided into two comparative groups for a prospective study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTo (1) establish a women's knee health consumer advisory group (CAG) via an evidence-informed process and (2) identify the CAG's research priorities to inform future projects. Mixed-methods priority-setting study. The CAG was established, grounded in a participatory action research approach and using the Patient Engagement in Research Framework, to inform a 4-phase process: (1) understand, (2) plan, (3) undertake, and (4) evaluate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!